Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
42. Which source are you depending on for this information?
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 04:25 PM
Dec 2015

Not your assumptions but a good explanation from credible experts/

And leave your ass out of it thank you.

Posted already...please delete... Human101948 Dec 2015 #1
I hadn't seen it before ashling Dec 2015 #7
but... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #54
Untrue. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #62
What caused the hight temperatures that caused molten metal for so very long? wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #64
Think of it like a combination of wood stove, underground oven (like a Lovo)that sort of thing. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #66
yea woodstoves... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #67
Oh, I see, you're just going to jump around and make shit up. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #68
no. wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #69
Concrete. Not a great heatsink. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #70
the steel not concrete... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #71
The WALLS of the pit and the 'lid' are concrete. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #72
all that sophistry has little to do wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #73
Mixing terms again. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #74
Bogus my ass. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #33
Which source are you depending on for this information? Human101948 Dec 2015 #42
I have tables and charts at home. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #44
NIST claimed that temperatures never reached the levels we are discussing... Human101948 Dec 2015 #47
AND YET burning office furniture has exceeded the failure point of steel. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #48
We're talking about WTC1 and WTC2. Read the report... Human101948 Dec 2015 #49
I used WTC7/Windsor as an example of what steel can and has done in a fire. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #60
Windsor Tower steel DID NOT collapse into the street like soft taffy nationalize the fed Dec 2015 #53
Your link helps make AtheistCrusader's point. cpwm17 Dec 2015 #55
That's why I find the Windsor Tower such a useful example. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #58
You have no idea how the windsor tower is designed. You're looking at the remaining concrete pillars AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #57
Oh, too funny! Warpy Dec 2015 #2
The only part of the prevailing conspiracy theories I've ever thought merited looking into . . . markpkessinger Dec 2015 #8
Yes, the official report identified the vertical column that failed and initiated the collapse Warpy Dec 2015 #9
It was set on fire by the falling, burning debris. cpwm17 Dec 2015 #11
Yes, but the oficial report had the steel fail Warpy Dec 2015 #13
A thought that may or may not be possible with the WTC rpannier Dec 2015 #16
That sounds totally insane. Thor_MN Dec 2015 #21
It's in Japan rpannier Dec 2015 #23
I'm doubtful. Maybe something lost in translation? Thor_MN Dec 2015 #26
I'm pretty sure the experts that have much more experience in these matters cpwm17 Dec 2015 #17
Exactly, which is why I'm not adding to any silliness. Warpy Dec 2015 #18
WTC 7 started to lean? nationalize the fed Dec 2015 #30
According to this fireman, speaking before WTC 7 collapsed: cpwm17 Dec 2015 #32
One wall was bulging/sagging, yes. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #36
Not a chance BetterThanNoSN Dec 2015 #37
Complete bull. cpwm17 Dec 2015 #38
Seriously? BetterThanNoSN Dec 2015 #39
You conveniently left out the part of the "terrible loss of life." cpwm17 Dec 2015 #40
Pull the firefighting effort from the building, or pull the building down? AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #45
Gravity is a bitch, my friend. longship Dec 2015 #56
Indeed. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #59
I've attended a lecture and discussion with the NIST investigator who... PosterChild Dec 2015 #20
really! Pharaoh Dec 2015 #28
What's the point of your reply? eom PosterChild Dec 2015 #29
Have you seen this BBC clip? nationalize the fed Dec 2015 #31
Fog of war. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #34
No, I have not seen it.... PosterChild Dec 2015 #41
Not just investigative efforts, but AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #46
+100 !! PosterChild Dec 2015 #50
Technically, three key pillar/yokes. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #35
What you describe is exactly... PosterChild Dec 2015 #52
"If it was a conspiracy, I do not care." Hal Bent Dec 2015 #3
"Your argument is invalid. Find a job." Xithras Dec 2015 #4
Maybe the fuel was High-Test (High-test fuel will burn at 2230 degrees) I think or... BlueJazz Dec 2015 #5
Jet fuel is like kerosene, it is not like.... Hotler Dec 2015 #12
Hotler, your post I understand and believe to be true. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #25
The experiment proves sulphurdunn Dec 2015 #6
Obviously not a man of science. canoeist52 Dec 2015 #10
He's a blacksmith. He knows how metal behaves with heat. Warpy Dec 2015 #15
Great fun, but he should have shown a thermometer to convince me of the temp. rgbecker Dec 2015 #14
"shine a beam on an object "? Why would you believe an infrared thermometer Thor_MN Dec 2015 #22
Fuck this guy. liberalnarb Dec 2015 #19
+1 mwrguy Dec 2015 #51
I never heard that theory about 9/11 and don't understand a word of it, but that video made me JDPriestly Dec 2015 #24
This view of the WTC explains a lot. N/T MIKE UU Dec 2015 #27
You're right, there were a lot windows... Human101948 Dec 2015 #43
That's why WTC structural steel was coated with asbestos. ucrdem Dec 2015 #61
Vermiculite from Libby, MT, a superfund site that is killing people to this day. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #63
propaganda can't melt steel beams! wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #65
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»For the undying 9/11 MORO...»Reply #42