Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
4. we have also updated firearms laws
Sun Jun 26, 2016, 01:16 PM
Jun 2016

the big changes in 1934, 1968, and 1986. This ended the manufacturer for civilians and limited ownership of fully automatic firearms.

So get cracking on repealing it. How hard could it be? Just reading posts Jun 2016 #1
We can do it IronLionZion Jun 2016 #2
As I've said elsewhere, some gun control proposals are certainly Constitutional, Just reading posts Jun 2016 #7
The OP is not about repealing the 2A passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #44
Sure it is. It ends, "And we have passed and repealed prohibition and slavery amendments." Just reading posts Jun 2016 #56
That doesn't mean the OP wants to repeal necessarily passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #60
I think it's pretty clear. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #64
Not playin passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #65
Just asking for a clarification. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #66
Kudos on successfully tamping down gun control! nt onehandle Jun 2016 #3
As Bert said in "Tremors 2"..... Just reading posts Jun 2016 #8
Easiest way to do something about it is to elect Democrats and change Supreme Court. Even Scalia Hoyt Jun 2016 #13
"Just reading...." MyOwnPeace Jun 2016 #29
we have also updated firearms laws Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #4
People act like it is so impossible IronLionZion Jun 2016 #6
Agreed TeddyR Jun 2016 #10
That's the case with most laws IronLionZion Jun 2016 #11
We have many gun laws already in place TeddyR Jun 2016 #24
Why don't you write one then? passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #45
Do you have more details on that? yurbud Jun 2016 #20
Cool. How many folks have been shot by fully automatics in the past year? stone space Jun 2016 #31
Very few if any Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #32
Sounds like an effective appoach, then. stone space Jun 2016 #34
I am against it but I support your right Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #35
Why would you oppose something that you suggested and admit has ben effective? stone space Jun 2016 #37
Because it is not feasible Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #38
What percentage of gun owners are law-abiding, in your opinion? stone space Jun 2016 #39
99% Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #40
The like to pretend they're only concerned with criminals Press Virginia Jun 2016 #55
That sounds like a challenge. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #46
Go for it Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #47
Very few are shot with those scary black rifles Press Virginia Jun 2016 #53
I am fine with everyone having... 3catwoman3 Jun 2016 #5
And in the meantime, you can have all the quills you want to exercise your 1st Amendment rights. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #9
You know - when people make an argument like that packman Jun 2016 #16
Just Reading Posts: SCantiGOP Jun 2016 #19
Yeah, I've noticed folks here threatening to exercise their First Amendment Rights... stone space Jun 2016 #33
I do not think they imagined Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #36
Unless there is free software they can buy out there passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #48
This is such a sad, sorry argument Scootaloo Jun 2016 #67
The Supreme Court TeddyR Jun 2016 #12
Yeah, and Scalia only talked of guns in the home. We have a chance to get rid of the racist Justices Hoyt Jun 2016 #14
You really think that Supreme Court justices Kennedy, Roberts, Thomas and Alito are racists? TeddyR Jun 2016 #22
You don't? Hoyt Jun 2016 #27
You didn't answer my question TeddyR Jun 2016 #28
They said arms, passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #49
Of course everyone knows they didn't really mean that. DirkGently Jun 2016 #18
I agree and disagree with some of your points TeddyR Jun 2016 #23
Ok, so members of the militia have to be in good working order too. In relatively good shape MillennialDem Jun 2016 #26
Federal law says "able bodied" Press Virginia Jun 2016 #54
Madison was fairly clear about the benefit Press Virginia Jun 2016 #52
The 2nd will not be repealed... deathrind Jun 2016 #15
Sounds sensible - A good beginning anyway packman Jun 2016 #17
it doesn't need to be repealed--it just needs the kind of limits we place on speech, religion, etc. yurbud Jun 2016 #21
There are all kinds of limits that can be placed on gun ownership that are probably constitutional TeddyR Jun 2016 #25
Yes, MyOwnPeace Jun 2016 #30
There is a lot of political will passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #50
You want a type of gun banned that Press Virginia Jun 2016 #57
It's not a matter of just counting bodies passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #59
Drum mags have been used exactly once and the gun jammed Press Virginia Jun 2016 #61
I'm fine with my hysteria thanks passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #62
Oh...if we're not using the FBI defition, the body count drops to under 100 Press Virginia Jun 2016 #63
or with NRA bucks going to their opponents. yurbud Jun 2016 #73
It's always in the details Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #41
How many times has a drum mag been used in the 15 mass shootings Press Virginia Jun 2016 #58
I guess.... deathrind Jun 2016 #69
Beats being afraid of something that's been used a single time and malfunctioned. Press Virginia Jun 2016 #70
The Tucson shooter deathrind Jun 2016 #71
The VPI shooter used 10rd mags and killed 32 people Press Virginia Jun 2016 #72
Also, what the country was like Warpy Jun 2016 #42
I think our national guard is our well regulated militia IronLionZion Jun 2016 #43
Federal Law says "bubba" is a member of the Militia Press Virginia Jun 2016 #51
That's what Putin wants you to think IronLionZion Jun 2016 #68
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»What guns were like when ...»Reply #4