Video & Multimedia

calimary

(81,110 posts)

55. I certainly don't think it's crazy. Not at all. When you consider who's involved and what their

Wed Nov 21, 2012, 07:17 PM

Nov 2012

track record has been, longterm. I think there's something to it, absolutely. Wouldn't be a bit surprised. If kkkarl rove's involved, suspect a rat. Suspect there's something no good afoot.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

123 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Thom Hartmann: Why it's not crazy to think Anonymous stopped Karl Rove From Stealing the Election P2 [View all] thomhartmann Nov 2012 OP

just from the timing of the release of the hostages, many of us knew something fishy had niyad Nov 2012 #1

This should be required viewing xfundy Nov 2012 #2

you are correct, it should be required viewing. he did mention kerry, but only in passing. niyad Nov 2012 #3

Amen. I believe that these things should be spread far & wide.. I cannot believe some of the Ecumenist Nov 2012 #4

But...but, they are only looking out for our best interests. rhett o rick Nov 2012 #5

I thought that efforts to stop Husted's last minute software patch were decisive. Overseas Nov 2012 #123

Thank you Anonymous and KegCreekDem Nov 2012 #6

Only one problem. It is not true except that he frames it as "possible" Coyotl Nov 2012 #110

Methinks thou dost protesteth too much. KegCreekDem Nov 2012 #122

No E-Voting in Germany. OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #7

Wow, exactly-- 'a high degree of [physical] effort' cprise Nov 2012 #67

All good and well, but it proves nothing about 2012, so Thom is just back-pedalling Coyotl Nov 2012 #8

The Germans banned electronic voting OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #10

So would I. But that doesn't prove anything except that I have good taste in voting. Coyotl Nov 2012 #14

"But, what if everyone could read and test the code? " OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #16

your dog has a nice smile............ kooljerk666 Nov 2012 #21

Why assume I need to be told what is wrong with voting today? Coyotl Nov 2012 #22

How can you "prove" what is non-factual? OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #26

Large corporations also control the circuitry cprise Nov 2012 #68

Why in the world are you contorting yourself into a pretzel 99th_Monkey Nov 2012 #18

I think the word is "CONTEXT" 99th_Monkey Nov 2012 #17

You have to see what he said before this tape to know what he is back-petalling Coyotl Nov 2012 #23

I've seen all THREE of Thom's tapes on this story 99th_Monkey Nov 2012 #25

He did that to prop up his own viewpoint. Coyotl Nov 2012 #48

"prop up his own viewpoint"? is an undeserved slur 99th_Monkey Nov 2012 #79

Why isn't it "a silly CT to think Rove tried to steal OH"? Coyotl Nov 2012 #81

What is yor take on Michael Collins' reporting on the 2012 primaries? reusrename Nov 2012 #89

Collins was not the only one who noticed the 2012 GOP Primary vote-buggery 99th_Monkey Nov 2012 #97

Ron Paul was an infinitely better candidate. reusrename Nov 2012 #99

If you are such an "insider" with first-hand knowledge of how Rove REALLY stole OH 99th_Monkey Nov 2012 #98

This is exactly why this video was produced. reusrename Nov 2012 #73

+10 99th_Monkey Nov 2012 #78

I TOO AM GRATEFUL TO TOM FOR SHARING THESE NASTY TRUTHS, BUT drynberg Nov 2012 #9

You can start "now" by joining the groups we started eight years ago! Coyotl Nov 2012 #82

The number one problem is our news media. Festivito Nov 2012 #95

Benghazi could have been a CIA operation to hurt Obama to influence the election. amywalk Nov 2012 #11

amywalk, your comment has not been lost. A whole lot of us bonniebgood Nov 2012 #46

or it could have been war crimes reusrename Nov 2012 #117

And Behind The Scenes This Was Found Out By The Obama Administration And...... global1 Nov 2012 #77

If Anonymous had proof on Rove they would spill it. iandhr Nov 2012 #12

Anon actually promised in the video to spill the evidence Coyotl Nov 2012 #15

Seriously LiberalLovinLug Nov 2012 #28

So, that proves this election was totally on the up and up and Rove RC Nov 2012 #20

Try to understand that I am skeptical of what hasn't been proven Coyotl Nov 2012 #24

"We election integrity activists have been organized since 2004..." OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #27

yes!!!! heaven05 Nov 2012 #36

On the Internet, anyone can claim to be an "election integrity activist" Coyotl Nov 2012 #49

Still waiting on your evidence. OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #75

Still waiting on your evidence Coyotl Nov 2012 #80

Why should I take your word for it? OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #88

Sounds like Edison/Mitofsky doesn't it. reusrename Nov 2012 #116

You just gave the exact reason Anonymous may not want to reveal their identity cui bono Nov 2012 #108

Noone is asking Anon to reveal an identity. Besides, this is NOT Anon Coyotl Nov 2012 #112

Not necessarily. bvar22 Nov 2012 #69

Here, Here! Rockyj Nov 2012 #74

This message was self-deleted by its author bvar22 Nov 2012 #94

bookmarking for later. barbtries Nov 2012 #13

I will watch this later, but regardless of whether Anonymous thwarted Rove or not deutsey Nov 2012 #19

NOW you have DONE IT, Thom. bvar22 Nov 2012 #29

Absolutely! PROVE IT!!! or STFU. New Rule on DU. 99th_Monkey Nov 2012 #33

No, just prove unbelievable, extraordinary claims. No need to STFU Coyotl Nov 2012 #50

God you are annoying Pbs1914 Nov 2012 #59

How many threads are there on this topic? Coyotl Nov 2012 #64

It appears you have a fan. pintobean Nov 2012 #85

But not of my work! Coyotl Nov 2012 #87

Thanks for taking it down a notch. reusrename Nov 2012 #102

You're kidding Coyotl Nov 2012 #103

No, no, not snake oil. Mike Collins' report on the 2012 primaries. reusrename Nov 2012 #115

Prove it? RoccoR5955 Nov 2012 #45

Amen! Rockyj Nov 2012 #71

Since Jeb Bush is gearing up for 2016, bookmark this video Samantha Nov 2012 #30

'This is treason,' elleng Nov 2012 #31

Weird, huh? OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #34

THANKYOU. Given all that, the bank bailouts, and more, snot Nov 2012 #38

STFU elleng Nov 2012 #41

Uh oh. Here comes The List. nt OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #42

Yup, post right above yours has it. cui bono Nov 2012 #105

...OR... bvar22 Nov 2012 #40

We Dems do want to mention it, and love when someone can prove it too Coyotl Nov 2012 #51

Sorry, should have said Dem higher-ups in the party, elleng Nov 2012 #53

But do you see how combative you are in that post? cui bono Nov 2012 #106

no Coyotl Nov 2012 #111

After a break for months as all hands were applegrove Nov 2012 #32

It would be better OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #35

is that like not displaying heaven05 Nov 2012 #39

What? OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #44

Very well-put, erudite, insightful, and a joy to read Coyotl Nov 2012 #83

both heaven05 Nov 2012 #100

I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that if Rove or anyone did steal applegrove Nov 2012 #47

Really? I do not seem to remember a big investigation after the 2000 elections. nt Sadiedog Nov 2012 #54

That is because Al Gore, acting like a decent human being, gave applegrove Nov 2012 #56

Your post #56 is pure speculation. bvar22 Nov 2012 #92

It is common knowledge that Gore lost when he chose not applegrove Nov 2012 #118

I'm pretty sure Al Gore knows better. reusrename Nov 2012 #107

Are you saying you'd rather not have had Al Gore as president? applegrove Nov 2012 #119

Not at all. reusrename Nov 2012 #121

There was no massive criminal investigation OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #72

Criminal investigations only come to light with prosecutions, so you are maintaining you know Coyotl Nov 2012 #84

Away with you, OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #90

Don't you just hate it when a Coyotl Nov 2012 #52

Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #60

Turnabout is fair play! bvar22 Nov 2012 #91

I was all for an open discussion on voter suppression this election. applegrove Nov 2012 #120

Thanks for this. Eye-opening. Hartmann's a Great American. byronius Nov 2012 #37

rethugs heaven05 Nov 2012 #43

I certainly don't think it's crazy. Not at all. When you consider who's involved and what their calimary Nov 2012 #55

Romney's own polling had Obama up by 5% on Election Day Stargleamer Nov 2012 #57

Wow this was awesome. psychmommy Nov 2012 #58

I basically wrote the exact same thing in a thread a few weeks back Pbs1914 Nov 2012 #61

So I'm glad Thom Hartman expanded on that idea having come to a similar conclusion Pbs1914 Nov 2012 #62

Amazing Video Pbs1914 Nov 2012 #63

At the same time this is all old history and very familiar Coyotl Nov 2012 #65

Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #76

"And that's the way it is." Good job, dude. Good job. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #66

kickski Snarkoleptic Nov 2012 #70

Can A Political Party Be Charged With Treason? If So, We Should Nominate Republicans For The Honor cantbeserious Nov 2012 #86

Quoting you, Thom: ProSense Nov 2012 #93

That's not what he said until the first comments came under criticism Coyotl Nov 2012 #101

Anonymous claims to have abandoned that approach. reusrename Nov 2012 #114

"Eisenhower was the last legitmately elected Republican president." cui bono Nov 2012 #96

It is not true if you think about it Coyotl Nov 2012 #104

I don't think that if the treason were truly exposed and prosecuted they would get elected and cui bono Nov 2012 #109

We exposed Iran-Contra and that did not stop Bush I from winning once. Coyotl Nov 2012 #113