Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
32. Did I hear wrong???
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 11:28 AM
Dec 2012

Simpson explains that the life expectancy was 57 when SS was set up - THAT'S why the set the age of retirement at SIXTY-FIVE - cause they figured no one would ever make it to 65 in the future! So, if I may use this as an example...... I buy a new car and decide to purchase an exdtended warranty on it.... But this warranty I'm gonna pay on every month - it does nada for me UNLESS my car lasts thru 30 years of regular use. Now, I KNOW - and the DEALER KNOWS - that cars are lucky to make it out to 20 years of age. Still, as my car ages, I'm dutifully paying my monthly installment on the warranty I hope to make use of one day. The premium payments add up to a tidy sum after a few years - a sum that I could've USED to keep my car maintained so it would last longer. But I steele myself that I'm doing the right thing for my future. It's a capable vehicle and if I never have to buy a new one, that warranty that only kicks in when the car hits 30 - that warranty's gonna be my salvation!

Well, in a miracle of motoring, my stalwart old dobbin makes it to age 30. It's still serving me, but boy.... would a good tune-up and some fresh tires be nice! And I tell the aging dealer that as I stand there with my extended warranty plan in my hand.
"Welllllllllll......" the owner of Simpson Motors drawls "that warranty's not worth much these days. See, foreign competitors came into the market with better quality - longer lasting cars. OUR car industry had to match their quality and build cars that had a real chance at seeing 30 years of age. The warranties we sell nowdays are for cars that are lucky enough to persevere through 40 years of use - so now HOW would it be fair to these new warranty suckers if we paid folks like YOU when your car made it to thirty? Don't be distraught though. Those premiums you paid? Look at the fine improvements they've made possible for the dealership! Think of the jobs created thanks to the extra CPAs and facilities maintenance folks your premiums required to keep track of.
I'll tell ya what - how's bout we give you a tank of gas and a new set of wiper blades and call it even? Would that make ya feel better??? C'mon, you're not gonna be able to keep drivin' much longer anyways - wiper blades and gas - how can you beat that? For FREE, no less!"

What a jerk. zeemike Dec 2012 #1
The lesser people... you know former_con Dec 2012 #2
Simpson is a master of rhetoric appealing to the young and the poor, while simultaneously screwing TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #9
Overconfident, bragging thieves have earned... BlueNoteSpecial Dec 2012 #40
Frankly, I lost track of how many lies he told there. TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #13
Did I hear wrong??? Plucketeer Dec 2012 #32
Excellent analogy... you heard it right... former_con Dec 2012 #35
May I post your analogy elsewhere? n/t bitchkitty Dec 2012 #43
Sure thing! Plucketeer Dec 2012 #44
So customerserviceguy Dec 2012 #3
Presumably the same way ANY of our debt obligations will be redeemed. TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #8
I like many things about Simpson, but he has this thing about Social Security, Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #4
Thanks for expressing this so clearly. h2ebits Dec 2012 #5
Thank you! There's an equally clear solution. Remove the payroll tax cap. TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #19
Alan Simpson's version of the 47%. Lesser people. hay rick Dec 2012 #6
In fact, we know what the attitude of the elites is. TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #20
Rick's Burgers, in Spokane, hasa Whammy, a Double Whammy, and a Triple Whammy. jtuck004 Dec 2012 #7
Hah! Good point. TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #11
The largest holder of U.S. debt is its citizens Samantha Dec 2012 #10
All very true! It's even MORE clever than Norquist's 'starve the beast' strategy. TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #30
Those "IOUs" are US Treasuries, the epitome of security. Zen Democrat Dec 2012 #12
Exactly. UNLESS somebody is trying to float the idea that money owed by STATE governments to TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #15
Then why did RWers mock Gore for the SS Lock-box idea in 2000? nt ErikJ Dec 2012 #14
Better yet...why did they elect THE SHRUB when Gore was promising to use Clinton's budget surplus TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #17
Sometimes so-called conspiracy theories are just the truth. savannah43 Dec 2012 #16
Well, I'm a bigger fan of Occam's Razor. TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #18
"Why assume conspiracy when incompetence will do?" FiveGoodMen Dec 2012 #38
If they decide not to honor the Treasuries that SS holds Angry Dragon Dec 2012 #21
Iceland style! I like it! TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #26
The Social Security trust fund wouldn't be full of IOUs WhoIsNumberNone Dec 2012 #22
Simpson is about as bright as Jessica. AAO Dec 2012 #23
We are at a point, where the choice is Social Security or defense, and he refuses to cut defense. happyslug Dec 2012 #24
The big Republican Lie, told by a Republican liar and sadly, repeated even here sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #25
The "IOU's" in the Social Security Trust Fund... jjewell Dec 2012 #27
Yes, that would certainly be true if the SS Trust fund asked for the money when the Bonds mature, TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #28
What a clear view hodger Dec 2012 #29
Thank you! TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #31
Fantastic post Left Turn Only Dec 2012 #34
Hows that song go? Plucketeer Dec 2012 #33
It's all in t-bills. Republicans default on one single t-bill Warpy Dec 2012 #36
The SS Trust Fund could provide a written statement (like a bank statement) of borrowers and DhhD Dec 2012 #37
Bonds to China joetubes Dec 2012 #39
IOUs? paleotn Dec 2012 #41
What a creep. Quantess Dec 2012 #42
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Here's a soft lie that mu...»Reply #32