HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » The DU Lounge (Forum) » Question about moon-landi... » Reply #19

Response to Aristus (Original post)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 01:09 AM

19. This fellow has an interesting and productive take on fringe thought.

I am immune to most CT thought but have never been satisfied with official narratives of JFK assassination and 9/11.


Dr. Richard Stepp grabs the orange snowshoe by one end as an ersatz pointer to trace an island-hopping path from Northern Europe to Greenland to North America on the overhead projector map. He brought the snowshoe to his April 19 Bigfoot lecture at the Freshwater Grange to demonstrate a point about, well, big feet, but he's taken a detour to talk about another seemingly wild idea: the theoretical journeys of pre-Columbian Vikings.

The hall is packed. There are families, a few burly men with Whitman-esque beards and one woman in a pair of thematically appropriate furry black Ugg boots. Among them are skeptics, believers, the curious and the regulars who've come for the soup potluck. Like the Viking voyage, Stepp's introduction is a long way around to Sasquatch, but he's getting there. By the time he's delineating types of hominids, shuffling stacks of books and relating the tale of a purported Bigfoot abduction, he's right back in professor mode, the projector light rising up in his features like the glow of a campfire.

It's a version of a lecture Stepp has given before to students at Humboldt State University, where he taught for 39 years in the physics department before his final retirement in 2012. He is not trying to argue the existence of Bigfoot so much as why the possibility, along with other so-called "crackpot" theories a label he tosses around gleefully shouldn't be dismissed out of hand.

"This is the logical circle: Only crazy people talk about Bigfoot, so if you talk about Bigfoot, no matter what your background, you're crazy," he says. That, he feels, is a dangerous assumption, leading scientists to abandon their methods and turn away from empirical study out of prejudice and self preservation.

"A subject that will not get funded and will endanger your career may never be studied," he says. The resulting blind spots in our collective knowledge extend beyond UFOs and yetis, potentially blacking out less-than-lucrative topics and politically unpopular conclusions.

more at link: http://www.northcoastjournal.com/humboldt/crackpot/Content?oid=3718243

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 27 replies Author Time Post
Aristus May 2016 OP
MosheFeingold May 2016 #1
kentauros May 2016 #7
MosheFeingold May 2016 #14
kentauros May 2016 #17
progressoid May 2016 #2
MosheFeingold May 2016 #15
frogmarch May 2016 #3
Orrex May 2016 #5
Oneironaut May 2016 #8
Orrex May 2016 #9
frogmarch May 2016 #13
sharp_stick May 2016 #4
frogmarch May 2016 #6
CanSocDem May 2016 #10
edbermac May 2016 #11
frogmarch May 2016 #12
sarge43 May 2016 #16
3catwoman3 Jun 2016 #25
Laffy Kat May 2016 #18
LineNew Reply This fellow has an interesting and productive take on fringe thought.
PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #19
Wolf Frankula Jun 2016 #20
kentauros Jun 2016 #21
uriel1972 Jun 2016 #22
Gidney N Cloyd Jun 2016 #23
malthaussen Jun 2016 #24
Mendocino Jun 2016 #26
pressbox69 Jun 2016 #27
Please login to view edit histories.