Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cab67

(2,992 posts)
3. I knew a letter carrier in Austin who had the opposite experience.
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 08:44 AM
Aug 2020

Not all high-crime areas are alike when it comes to letter carriers. Moreover, neither are all low-crime areas; a retired letter carrier I know in my town disliked one development not because of crime (which wasn't really bad), but because a couple of residents had no problem walking their large and minimally-socialized dogs without a leash.

I'm willing to go out on a limb and suggest that this isn't necessarily a matter of voter suppression. There are lots of public housing complexes in the LA area; that the USPS is focusing on just this one suggests it really does perceive a problem.

I'm not defending the action. I can see how this is a real problem for people with limited transportation. I'm just arguing that the rationale might not be as nefarious as some might argue.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Mail delivery suspended a...»Reply #3