Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

California

SHRED

(28,136 posts)

2. you are welcome

Reply to NYC_SKP (Reply #1)

Wed Oct 23, 2013, 11:16 PM

Oct 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here's my Covered California "Obamacare" rates...THANK YOU OBAMA!!! [View all] SHRED Oct 2013 OP

Thank you, SHRED, for posting the actual numbers. I am also in California and see the same results. NYC_SKP Oct 2013 #1

you are welcome SHRED Oct 2013 #2

Thanks SHRED.. russspeakeasy Oct 2013 #3

ur welcome SHRED Oct 2013 #4

That's like $8700 a year the Feds will spend on you. Do you pay that much in federal income tax? dkf Oct 2013 #5

You think the ACA is funded via Federal income tax? SHRED Oct 2013 #8

The subsidy, yes. Where else does it come from? dkf Oct 2013 #23

okay I didn't know... SHRED Oct 2013 #25

That goes towards Medicare, not towards funding the ACA. dkf Oct 2013 #33

Just call him a moucher and be done with it. JoePhilly Oct 2013 #27

I'm just wondering who will be left to actually pay taxes. dkf Oct 2013 #34

Clearly it will not be the 47% Mitt Romney was talking about. JoePhilly Oct 2013 #35

That used to be the function of a shitty economy. dkf Oct 2013 #36

All I can say, thank gawd for Tricare itsrobert Oct 2013 #6

Those copays are crazy NoOneMan Oct 2013 #13

what copays itsrobert Oct 2013 #16

Oh no! I meant copays for those plans shown in OP NoOneMan Oct 2013 #18

I have the lowest cost Medicare Advantage Plan. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #19

To be honest, no. NoOneMan Oct 2013 #21

In LA, you sometimes have to pay to park at your doctor's office. Strange don't you think? JDPriestly Oct 2013 #22

As long as their is profiteering then none of it is "fair" SHRED Oct 2013 #29

be sure to thank those who are paying much more for your subsidy :-) nt msongs Oct 2013 #7

bullshit SHRED Oct 2013 #9

Just use the same ages/zip, but double the income to $104,000 itsrobert Oct 2013 #10

What would a couple pay now for the same insurance? SHRED Oct 2013 #11

How is it funded? itsrobert Oct 2013 #12

I will agree... SHRED Oct 2013 #14

where does the subsidy come from? itsrobert Oct 2013 #15

Here's a bit of it SHRED Oct 2013 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #31

The OP concerns a couple 50 and 55 years old. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #20

Pre-ACA there is no insurance avaiable to us SHRED Oct 2013 #24

I could have *forced* an insurer to cover me since I had had continuous coverage Kolesar Oct 2013 #38

This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #32

Clearly he's part of the 47% that Mitt Romney was talking about, right? JoePhilly Oct 2013 #28

My rates look like they will double (according to the RWNJ's I know) Turbineguy Oct 2013 #26

This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #30

ACA Tax Provisions IronLionZion Oct 2013 #37