Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Georgia

bitterross

(4,066 posts)

1. If they substituted "Elected Officials" for media the law might be a good idea.

Reply to TexasTowelie (Original post)

Sun Apr 7, 2019, 06:00 AM

Apr 2019

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Apparently they have reading comprehension issues. "No law.. abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press" means NO LAW.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Georgia Republicans Seek to Regulate the Media [View all] TexasTowelie Apr 2019 OP

If they substituted "Elected Officials" for media the law might be a good idea. bitterross Apr 2019 #1

Correction - Scarsdale Apr 2019 #3

Unfortunately, you are correct. /nt bitterross Apr 2019 #4

They want to accredit journalists; watoos Apr 2019 #2

I Have Some Choice Words for Georgia Repukes, But They May Get Me Banned! DoctorJoJo Apr 2019 #5

Since When Do Republicans Support More Government Regulation? modrepub Apr 2019 #6

And section 2 of the bill would require Volaris Apr 2019 #7

Or more correctly, regulating the First Amendment Zambero Apr 2019 #8