Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(128,813 posts)
4. In this case, the SCOTUS deferred to the State Supreme Court
Mon Mar 19, 2018, 03:51 PM
Mar 2018

and considered it a "state" matter. The Wisconsin and Maryland cases deal directly with the issue of "gerrymandering" and I suppose to help in deciding on some "threshold" for what is considered "gerrymandering". And in PA's case, Democrats' attempts to throw the 2011 GOP map out originally had been rejected by the district court (this past January) because the panel said there was no "threshold" or clear definition for what "gerrymandering" is.

Thus using the state Constitution as an alternate path, it could be argued that the lines were not "compact and contiguous" and that ultimately was what helped in our (Dems) case.

I hate Pennsylvania Republicans underpants Mar 2018 #1
i'm in NC barbtries Mar 2018 #8
Wisconsin needs to come next. bearsfootball516 Mar 2018 #2
In this case, the SCOTUS deferred to the State Supreme Court BumRushDaShow Mar 2018 #4
WONDERFUL Me. Mar 2018 #3
Great news! David__77 Mar 2018 #5
Awesome! Good news indeed! Va Lefty Mar 2018 #6
We're all winners FakeNoose Mar 2018 #7
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Redistricting: GOP in PA ...»Reply #4