Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pennsylvania

(16,230 posts)

7. The server date on that file is March 20, 2009. So it's at least that old.

Wed May 30, 2012, 08:27 PM

May 2012

http://files.dep.state.pa.us/OilGas/BOGM/BOGMPortalFiles/MarcellusShale

I'm skeptical that the information in that file is still both current and complete. If all of the up to date information is public then why are companies so concerned about confidentiality? Why are doctors required to sign confidentiality agreements?
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/apr/21/nation/la-na-adv-fracking-doctors-20120422

That's an old file with outdated information.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

‘Fracking’ bosses would choke if tables turned [View all] drm604 May 2012 OP

That article is just fucking perfect. CaliforniaPeggy May 2012 #1

Excellent SoutherDem May 2012 #3

knr alfredo May 2012 #4

One problem with the analogy. These guys have the CHOICE to walk out PA Democrat May 2012 #5

PA DEP posts ingredients bbinacan May 2012 #6

Confidentiality agreements bbinacan May 2012 #10

There is a newer site JPZenger May 2012 #11

Reminds me JPZenger May 2012 #9

Don't click on the link. It's pro pri itrary. nt DCKit Jun 2012 #12