Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(43,333 posts)
10. yes, the JC is a RW publication with very a very dodgy track record of support, agendas, and attacks
Thu Nov 7, 2019, 05:27 PM
Nov 2019

They were amongst the biggest UK backers of Operation Protective Edge, and Operation Cast Lead.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jewish_Chronicle

Editorial position

Pollard accepts that the paper does not present a comprehensive picture of events, saying in 2009, "But don't forget who our readership is. They are interested in getting the news about Israel. It's not a biased view. We are presenting one aspect of all the news that is going on. Nobody gets all their news from the JC; we're a complementary news source."

In 2014, the editor apologised on behalf of the paper for running an advertisement by the Disasters Emergency Committee appealing for funds for humanitarian relief for Gaza. He said that he and the paper did not support the appeal and were "entirely supportive" of Operation Protective Edge. He disputed the reported number of civilian casualties and asserted that many were terrorists.

In June 2019, Pollard said "I think in the last few years there’s certainly been a huge need for the journalism that the JC does in especially looking at the anti-Semitism in the Labour party and elsewhere” and "there’s such a huge need for our proper crusading independent journalism". Kessler Foundation chair Clive Wolman said: “In the end, we and the JC Trust decided that our primary consideration had to be to preserve the editorial independence of the JC, particularly at a time when its journalists are playing such an important role in exposing anti-Semitism in British politics. In July 2019, a Jewish Chronicle editorial declared that "We want to see (the current Labour Party leadership) removed from any significant role in public life."


Lawsuits, rulings and criticism

snip

In 2009, a peace activist accepted £30,000 damages and an apology from the paper over false claims that he had harboured two suicide bombers.

In May 2012, Dr Othman Moqbel, Dr Hussein Nagi and Mr Mohamad Yousef of Human Appeal International received an apology and substantial damages from The Jewish Chronicle following articles published in February of that year in the newspaper and on its website, suggesting that Human Appeal International, a British charity, had been designated as a terrorist organisation by the US government and had diverted donations to fund terror and to support the families of suicide bombers. An apology was published in the newspaper on 31 May and on its website on 30 May.

In August 2015, dozens of prominent Jewish activists signed an open letter criticising the paper for what they viewed as its "character assassination" of Corbyn. They wrote: "Your assertion that your attack on Jeremy Corbyn is supported by 'the vast majority of British Jews' is without foundation. We do not accept that you speak on behalf of progressive Jews in this country. You speak only for Jews who support Israel, right or wrong." They continued, "There is something deeply unpleasant and dishonest about your McCarthyite guilt by association technique. Jeremy Corbyn's parliamentary record over 32 years has consistently opposed all racism including antisemitism." Signatories to the letter included Laurence Dreyfus, Selma James, Miriam Margolyes, Ilan Pappé, Michael Rosen and Avi Shlaim.

In August 2017, the Jewish Chronicle published a ruling by The Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) that an article it had published earlier that year about a court case was in breach of the Editors' Code of Practice by identifying family members of the defendent. The Judge did not accept the defences of the Jewish Chronicle that the family members were prominent members of the community or that the family had been referenced in the proceedings, albeit without identifying individual members.

In February 2018, The Jewish Chronicle falsely reported that Mike Sivier, a blogger and Labour Party member, was a holocaust denier. IPSO upheld a complaint by Mr Sivier that the newspaper had misrepresented online comments he had made.

In April 2019, the Jewish Chronicle published a ruling by IPSO that articles it had published on May 2017 and April 2018 about an author critical of Zionism contained inaccuracies regarding venue denial activity by Jewish organisations and the author's views on the relationship between Zionism and Nazi Germany and that it had failed to issue a timely correction. The Jewish Chronicle said that they had relied on comments made by the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews.

In August 2019, Interpal received an apology and damages of £50,000 after The Jewish Chronicle implied that the charity had links to terrorist activity. On 23 August, the paper published the apology in full, together with an article by Ibrahim Hewitt, chair of trustees of Interpal.
and I suspect among non-Jews that opinion would be split, which is just another reason I don't think still_one Nov 2019 #1
Labour shoots itself in the foot keeping this demagogue in power. Beakybird Nov 2019 #2
Genuine question from somebody who isn't really a Corbyn fan: Denzil_DC Nov 2019 #3
I think the big one for me is Soph0571 Nov 2019 #4
I believe, back in 2013, he actually referred to "British Zionists", not Jews as a bloc, Denzil_DC Nov 2019 #6
superb reply Celerity Nov 2019 #7
Well, thanks. Denzil_DC Nov 2019 #8
yes, the JC is a RW publication with very a very dodgy track record of support, agendas, and attacks Celerity Nov 2019 #10
As those libels show, Pollard also has a tendency to project "anti-Semitism" on others, Denzil_DC Nov 2019 #12
thank you for all the input Celerity Nov 2019 #13
Oh, and while I'm here, my reply above was getting rather long, so I didn't post these: Denzil_DC Nov 2019 #9
+1 Celerity Nov 2019 #11
This gives Labour a serious credibility problem T_i_B Nov 2019 #5
Labour candidate pulls out of election over 'Shylock' remarks T_i_B Nov 2019 #14
Senior Labour Politician Sang "Hey Jews" To The Song "Hey Jude" T_i_B Nov 2019 #15
Refuted by Dan Hodges, who's usually hostile to Labour, especially on anti-Semitism. Denzil_DC Nov 2019 #16
Didn't stop the ludicrously pro-Corbyn Swawkbox from tweeting the worst hot take ever about this! T_i_B Nov 2019 #17
If I remember right, they were roundly ridiculed for that and deleted it. Denzil_DC Nov 2019 #18
No no no, that was a completely different ridiculous tweet... T_i_B Nov 2019 #19
Yes, you're right, T_i_B. Denzil_DC Nov 2019 #20
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Jewish Chronicle: 'The va...»Reply #10