Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Congress

Showing Original Post only (View all)

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:16 AM Jun 2014

A Crisis to Address: Why the Senate's Discussing a Democracy Amendment [View all]

http://www.opednews.com/articles/A-Crisis-to-Address-Why-t-by-John-Nichols-Citizens-United_Democracy_Elections_Finance-140606-97.html



A Crisis to Address: Why the Senate's Discussing a Democracy Amendment
By John Nichols
OpEdNews Op Eds 6/6/2014 at 17:12:52

The political crisis of confidence created by an activist Supreme Court's decisions in cases such as Citizens United v. FEC and McCutcheon v. FCC is beginning -- finally -- to garner appropriate consideration from the US Senate. That's important. What's even more important is that it is focused on the proper response to the crisis: amending the US Constitution in order to restore the right of citizens and their elected representatives to organize elections where the vote matters more than the dollar.

On Tuesday, Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, the chamber's assistant majority leader, chaired what Public Citizen identifies as "the first-ever hearing by the Senate Judiciary Committee on the need to amend the Constitution to overturn egregious US Supreme Court rulings like Citizens United and McCutcheon, which gave corporations and the ultra-wealthy the green light to spend unlimited amounts of money to influence elections."

Durbin was an engaged chair of the hearing by the Constitution Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee, having already declared, "It's increasingly clear that the only way to really reform our system is to pass a constitutional amendment to regulate how we finance our elections."

The senator is right. And the American people are supportive of his position; 16 states and more than 500 communities have formally asked Congress to back an amendment to clarify that, despite what the Supreme Court might imagine, corporations are not people and money is not speech. Still, the significance of this hearing, which comes as Senate Democratic leaders are talking about scheduling an amendment vote, ought not be underestimated. Nor should the fact that the number of senators supporting a constitiutional amendment is rapidly approaching a majority.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RULE #1: One may contribute only to campaigns for which one is eligible to cast a vote Kip Humphrey Jun 2014 #1
Good start... Wounded Bear Jun 2014 #2
+1. sueh Jun 2014 #3
Tough to regulate election spending Pantagruelsmember Jun 2014 #5
Agreed btrflykng9 Jun 2014 #6
Wasted political grandstanding Indydem Jun 2014 #4
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Congress»A Crisis to Address: Why ...»Reply #0