Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cha

(297,154 posts)
8. I know.. Willful cherry picking to try and make their unsubstantiated point..
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:26 AM
Nov 2015
"He starts off by selectively handpicking several polls trying to prove that Clinton is “unelectable” because in a few of these polls her “trustworthiness” has been questioned and her favorability numbers weren’t great.."

snip//

Just for the record, anyone who actually knows how to read polls or write about polling results wouldn’t cite numbers from 4-5 months ago when there have been several updated polls done since then showing updated results. Goodman obviously wanted to use the older polling results which were much more favorable toward Sanders to suit his narrative.

So clever.. Poor things.. they're going to have even more issues down the road with their way or their way proclamations.

Thank you for this from Forward Progressives, William.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Meet the Type of Liberal ...»Reply #8