Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

In reply to the discussion: NYTimes: Men, Who Needs Them? [View all]
 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
1. Someone needs to retake biology 101
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 12:03 PM
Aug 2012
That’s good, since women are both necessary and sufficient for reproduction, and men are neither.


Some species practice parthenogenesis. Humans are not one of them.


When I explained this to a female colleague and asked her if she thought that there was yet anything irreplaceable about men, she answered, “They’re entertaining.”


Would an article decrying the uselessness of the female species be as well received?

Keep saying fathers are worthless. Then keep acting shocked when so few men step up and act like fathers.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»NYTimes: Men, Who Needs T...»Reply #1