Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
29. Progress is slow when there's a strong financial incentive to keep it the way it is.
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 12:36 AM
Apr 2012

Large segments of court infrastructure are financed by child support.

Child welfare is to child support as healthcare is to health insurance.

Charles Bruce and debtors prison [View all] lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 OP
What was his income when he was accruing the debt? noamnety Apr 2012 #1
Imputed income is a fascinating topic. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #2
I can talk some about impuded income as it applied to us. noamnety Apr 2012 #3
I'd like to see some unbiased, real data on this case, too. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #4
Kids aren't a consumer good. One doesn't need "to pay for them", one needs to "parent" them. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #5
Here's my point. Going by the "traditional", Mitt Romney style family arrangement Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #6
The court can't mandate anything. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #7
You and I agree on much, but I think we part ways on a couple parts too. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #8
Responsibility for ones kids? Absolutely. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #9
I hear you, Jeff. In my family it was my dad who was the alcoholic. I do suspect that both our Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #14
Fitness based on what though? Whose criteria. There really only is one acceptable one stevenleser Apr 2012 #21
I'd start with who has been providing the majority of care, and then see how the kids feel. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #24
And I think that since the marital union is not an issue any longer, any arrangements made are not stevenleser Apr 2012 #25
You don't think, for instance, that the fact that one parent has spent 10 yrs in the workforce Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #26
No.Let's turn that around. Since one that one parent has spent 10 years in the workforce should they stevenleser Apr 2012 #27
You think I'm advocating for a particular position. I'm not. Nt Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #28
Dennis Rodman and Dave Foley Mammone Apr 2012 #12
Technically, Dave foley owes money in Canada, not the us. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #13
So they should go to jail? Mammone Apr 2012 #15
I'm sorry, but I'm not buying the narrative of "greedy ex... and !kids!" Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #16
The courts are the greedy ones Mammone Apr 2012 #17
Judges get a cut of child support that they order? Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #18
yes states get kickbacks and do pass on bonuses to judges Mammone Apr 2012 #19
excellent link. Bookmarking. nt lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #20
When your kids live with you half of the time, you are supporting them. Period. nt stevenleser Apr 2012 #22
I think denial of custodial rights should = no child support tech_smythe Apr 2012 #10
I think it should trigger revisiting the custody decision lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #11
a parent who prevents visitations... grasswire May 2012 #30
Unless it's the mother alienating the father... then it's ok tech_smythe May 2012 #31
The whole non-custodial parent is an invented and discriminatory state that is unnecessary stevenleser Apr 2012 #23
Progress is slow when there's a strong financial incentive to keep it the way it is. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #29
Is this Charles Bruce? Cokab16 Jun 2016 #32
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Charles Bruce and debtors...»Reply #29