Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ElboRuum

(4,717 posts)
10. After seeing that thread in H+M...
Thu May 17, 2012, 11:45 AM
May 2012

I am convinced that it in fact SHOULD BE.

Sorry to anyone that this upsets, I want to discuss issues of all types relevant to me in both a broad general sense and in the many perspectives that are personally relevant to me. It is why I come to DU.

I can do this with minimal interference with every perspective except one: gender. Proceeding from anything but the dogmatism of second-wave (or whatever "wave" it happens to be) feminist perspective is just an invitation for a pile-on. And I believe firmly that there is more in heaven and earth that what is in that philosophy. Bear in mind that I have no issue with any feminist individual on this board, and it is not meant as a slight to those who do embrace that philosophy, my only suggestion is that it is not the only thing or the only way, and we need a place to explore these and other things that directly or indirectly impact, negatively or positively, men's lives.

Men need a place to discuss their issues with freedom from negative interloping from people who disagree that men have any relevant issues, that they need to address them or work through them, or that they should go somewhere else to do it. I know that most of the feminists who have lurked and participated in this group have done so largely productively, understanding that this is "our" place. I thank them profusely for this understanding.

However, given the thread in H+M which just broad-stroked the entire group for the implication that men don't have real issues, that what issues they have are laughable and small and whinging, and that we deserve to be laughed at, I fully suspect that safe haven status is required for this group to be valuable for the purposes it's intended. Regardless of the nonsense in that thread, it is clear that some latitude be extended for the ability to discuss the issue. Several posts in that thread were thought provoking, even if the signal to noise ratio of the thread was quite low.

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Warren DeMontague May 2012 OP
You're reading that thread too, huh? WhoIsNumberNone May 2012 #1
I agree with you. Behind the Aegis May 2012 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Upton May 2012 #3
Agreed.. Upton May 2012 #4
definitely agreed. opiate69 May 2012 #5
Seconded tech_smythe May 2012 #6
Pardon my interruption... HappyMe May 2012 #7
EarlG has PPR'd on of your regulars Kaleva May 2012 #8
one of our regulars? opiate69 May 2012 #9
he and lumberjack were the reasons for the forum. they did the work. seabeyond May 2012 #13
as I understand it, though... opiate69 May 2012 #14
you said you hadnt seen him here but two days ago. i was giving you info. nt seabeyond May 2012 #15
I know... wasn`t trying to start another flamewar opiate69 May 2012 #18
He was a repeat return troll who probably has other sockpupppet identities Warren DeMontague May 2012 #21
Happy to agree with you sea... stevenleser May 2012 #24
He's been here since at least Feb. Kaleva May 2012 #16
I stand corrected, then. opiate69 May 2012 #17
Well, your post made me question my own eyes so I had to double check! Kaleva May 2012 #19
an accurate analogy. nt lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #40
I would have alerted... ElboRuum May 2012 #12
I was sort of hoping we could educate him. stevenleser May 2012 #25
There were at least 4 repeat sockpuppet/troll/zombie disruptors PPR'd in the old Feminists group. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #20
I'm not suggesting that each individual here is responsible for all that's posted in the group. Kaleva May 2012 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2012 #30
well, if you volunteer to host a "safe haven",... Kaleva May 2012 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2012 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2012 #35
I strongly disagree with your collective guilt implication. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #39
After seeing that thread in H+M... ElboRuum May 2012 #10
Well stated, Elbo opiate69 May 2012 #11
Hi Warren MadrasT May 2012 #22
I will also add that i dont consider myself a "mens rights activist", whatever that means. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #23
I think that Liberals/Progressives should support all groups being happy and liberated stevenleser May 2012 #26
Your last paragraph is vital IMO MadrasT May 2012 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2012 #36
Uhh, yes, you are absolutely correct that men are discriminated against!! HuskiesHowls May 2012 #37
Agreed!! HuskiesHowls May 2012 #27
That sounds like a reasonable attitude. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #28
I agree (n/t) a2liberal May 2012 #31
I'm of two minds on the safe haven idea lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2012 #41
Deleting because this has been essentially answered. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #42
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»This message was self-del...»Reply #10