Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Education

Jim__

(14,074 posts)

2. If the machines can't actually read, I have to wonder what they base their scores on.

Reply to HiPointDem (Original post)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 04:45 AM

Jun 2012

My guess is that they look for some sort of formulaic writing in the essays. If so, of course, we can then expect "good" teachers will teach their students to write following some formulaic approach; and eventually, formulaic writing will come to be the definition of "good writing". All to increase corporate profits.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

now pearson wants to machine-score essay tests. [View all] HiPointDem Jun 2012 OP

I hate this so much. n/t pnwmom Jun 2012 #1

If the machines can't actually read, I have to wonder what they base their scores on. Jim__ Jun 2012 #2

For those of us who know nothing about these things, indeed, that would be helpful. HereSince1628 Jun 2012 #4

Here's what good writing is for the Texas TAKS test (just superseded by STAAR) mbperrin Jun 2012 #6

Thanks for the information. I had no idea essays were so formulated. Jim__ Jun 2012 #7

I agree completely. But students must pass the test to graduate. mbperrin Jun 2012 #9

I'd like to see how they'd score Mark Twain PADemD Jun 2012 #3

Or Hemingway MannyGoldstein Jun 2012 #8

Or ee cummings proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #11

The idea of using a computer to grade essays, shows a fundamental ladjf Jun 2012 #5

I had to score something like that once. noamnety Jun 2012 #10