Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
3. Interesting, all a district has to do is track kids if they want more successful students.
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 09:41 AM
Feb 2013

The process for selecting the students who get to attend High Technology High results in a segregated school environment, one which Federal law prohibits for public schools (unless the school is a charter).
So perhaps the most important "habit" of these kids is hanging out with privileged white kids.
If these kids were still in the regular high school mix then other students would have their behavior as a model. Removing the highly successful kids from comprehensive high schools increases the numbers of less successful kids in those classrooms.
So, under the guise of choice we are re-segregating the public school system, of course the choice one has to make, for this system to to work for them or their children, is to belong to a privileged socioeconomic class.
I have no argument with the idea that student's habits and attitudes largely dictate their success. But if what we discover, when looking at student success, is that a family's socioeconomic success is tied to their children's success in school then we should not adopt school policies that will work to extend the privilege of the few at the expense of the many.
The gap between the rich and everybody else in this country is shameful. It is not a surprise that as families struggle to survive their children struggle in school.
Fix the income gap and much of the school success gap will disappear.

Habit # 1: Be born into affluent, ethnic majority, socially privileged family. n/t Tanuki Feb 2013 #1
+1,000,000. Connections determine "success" in life. n/t duffyduff Feb 2013 #9
+1. what a joke. strauss is usually better than this. HiPointDem Feb 2013 #15
It's a given that a population like that LWolf Feb 2013 #2
No, but one does have to be exposed to good habits to adopt them. iemitsu Feb 2013 #4
Of course it is. LWolf Feb 2013 #5
I agree that the 5 habits, identified in the article, are good habits and iemitsu Feb 2013 #12
You don't have to persuade me. LWolf Feb 2013 #17
Me either, you commie. iemitsu Feb 2013 #18
Probably the most offensive example of this elitist mentality is the Davidson School duffyduff Feb 2013 #6
Connections have everything to do with who gets ahead in this society. n2doc Feb 2013 #11
Very good points you make about segregating gifted students iemitsu Feb 2013 #13
I argue book success has little impact on whether the child makes a pile of money as an adult duffyduff Feb 2013 #10
I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. LWolf Feb 2013 #16
Excellent questions LWolf. iemitsu Feb 2013 #19
Interesting, all a district has to do is track kids if they want more successful students. iemitsu Feb 2013 #3
Study habits have nothing to do with "success," however that is defined duffyduff Feb 2013 #7
Study habits and the knowledge acquisition that comes along with those habits iemitsu Feb 2013 #14
"Great students" do NOT equal "success" in life duffyduff Feb 2013 #8
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Wash Post: Five habits of...»Reply #3