Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)

2. k&r for this response

Reply to mackdaddy (Reply #1)

Sun May 1, 2016, 11:24 AM

May 2016

Sure, wind is not perfect yet. Sure, we can and should design turbines with total life cycle costs in mind. But we need to do that with every technology. Picking on wind alone in this respect is silly.

-app

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Handlesblatt: Germany has a big new problem, dealing with its failed wind turbines. [View all] NNadir May 2016 OP

Machines wear out and have to be replaced. Why is that shocking? mackdaddy May 2016 #1

k&r for this response appal_jack May 2016 #2

Precisely Sherman A1 May 2016 #3

Um, um, um... NNadir May 2016 #6

And the fossil fuel inputs required to replace them... Binkie The Clown May 2016 #4

I'm not following the argument Boomer May 2016 #5

They should replace them with safe, clean Nuclear power n2doc May 2016 #7

None of the failed reactors killed as many people as will die in the next five hours from... NNadir May 2016 #8

You are afraid of that, but not automobiles or oil refineries? hunter May 2016 #9

What a bunch of nonsense... Finishline42 May 2016 #10

Um...um...um... NNadir May 2016 #11

Who going to pay for the decommissioning of the nuclear plants in the US? Finishline42 May 2016 #12

Answers to a few of your questions FBaggins May 2016 #13

Thanks for taking the time to reply, but... Finishline42 May 2016 #14

I'm afraid that you're suffering from confirmation bias FBaggins May 2016 #15