HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Environment & Energy » Environment & Energy (Group) » Ivanpah solar plant, buil... » Reply #6

Response to NNadir (Reply #5)

Tue Feb 14, 2017, 10:39 AM

6. If we are using the Mauna Loa chart,


why can't I just turn your argument right around and say:

"Nuclear energy has not, despite 62 years of wild eyed and, frankly delusional cheering, ..., addressed climate change. "

Nuclear power has been around for a long time, and yet we are still seeing higher amounts of CO2 in the air. Basically, what I am saying is that your argument based on the chart says less about the prospects of solar energy and more about the changes in population and living standards we have seen throughout the world.

I'm not opposed to nuclear energy, but I would also like to see advances in solar. Indeed, we have seen advances in solar photovoltaic, with the price coming down substantially over the past decade.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 9 replies Author Time Post
NNadir Feb 2017 OP
1965Comet Feb 2017 #1
NNadir Feb 2017 #3
1965Comet Feb 2017 #4
NNadir Feb 2017 #5
LineLineLineLineLineNew Reply If we are using the Mauna Loa chart,
1965Comet Feb 2017 #6
NNadir Feb 2017 #9
caraher Feb 2017 #2
hunter Feb 2017 #7
NNadir Feb 2017 #8
Please login to view edit histories.