Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 08:04 PM Apr 2017

Solar cell design with over 50% energy-conversion efficiency [View all]

http://www.kobe-u.ac.jp/research_at_kobe_en/NEWS/news/2017_04_21_01.html
[font face=Serif][font size=5]Solar cell design with over 50% energy-conversion efficiency[/font]

April 21, 2017 | Graduate School of Engineering

[font size=3]Solar cells convert the sun’s energy into electricity by converting photons into electrons. A new solar cell design could raise the energy conversion efficiency to over 50% by absorbing the spectral components of longer wavelengths that are usually lost during transmission through the cell. These findings were published on April 6 in the online edition of Nature Communications.

This research was carried out by a team led by Professor KITA Takashi and Project Assistant Professor ASAHI Shigeo at the Kobe University Graduate School of Engineering.

In theory, 30% energy-conversion efficiency is the upper limit for traditional single-junction solar cells, as most of the solar energy that strikes the cell passes through without being absorbed, or becomes heat energy instead. Experiments have been taking place around the world to create various solar cell designs that can lift these limitations on conversion efficiency and reduce the loss of energy. The current world record is at 46% percent for a 4-junction solar cell. If the energy-conversion efficiency of solar cells surpasses 50%, it would have a big impact on the cost of producing electricity.

In order to reduce these large energy losses and raise efficiency, Professor Kita’s research team used two small photons from the energy transmitted through a single-junction solar cell containing a hetero-interface formed from semiconductors with different bandgaps. Using the photons, they developed a new solar cell structure for generating photocurrents. As well as demonstrating theoretical results of up to 63% conversion efficiency, it experimentally achieved up-conversion based on two photons, a mechanism unique to this solar cell. The reduction in energy loss demonstrated by this experiment is over 100 times more effective compared to previous methods that used intermediate bands.

…[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14962
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gallium arsenide based. There isn't enough gallium on the entire planet to make this useless... NNadir Apr 2017 #1
And he's back ccarrick Apr 2017 #2
Um...you know what? NNadir May 2017 #3
Well, you would definitely be the inside expert on liars. kristopher May 2017 #4
Pot and kettle ccarrick May 2017 #5
Meanwhile, even as solar and wind are inexorably declining in price kristopher May 2017 #6
The reality-based community ccarrick May 2017 #7
I'm no great fan of nuclear power but... OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #8
No blank check for outdated nukes ccarrick May 2017 #9
Well, the offshore wind projects are starting OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #10
As they build more renewables, then what obsolete generation will be turned off? kristopher May 2017 #11
I'm sorry? OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #12
How do you suggest we impose that order on a dynamic economic entity? kristopher May 2017 #13
What effect will the... NeoGreen May 2017 #14
Methane is another carbon emission and greenhouse gas, so, yes, it counts OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #15
That is pie-in-the-sky BS from the nuclear lobby. kristopher May 2017 #24
Hansen's proposed carbon fee would be a good start OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #16
In case you missed the headline - a carbon tax can't be passed kristopher May 2017 #17
Sophie Sez #1: You loaded 16 tons, what do you get? OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #18
I don't click thru on videos kristopher May 2017 #21
Too bad... so sad... OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #22
So you still can't actually engage on a point when it goes against your beliefs? kristopher May 2017 #23
Sophie Sez #2: "Obama Missed a Golden Opportunity but We Can Still Win!" OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #19
But it hasn't passed, has it? kristopher May 2017 #25
Sophie Sez #3: "$1000 for You A Better World for Your Children" OKIsItJustMe May 2017 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Solar cell design with ov...»Reply #0