Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OnlinePoker

(5,719 posts)
15. Slight exageration on wages
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 09:45 PM
Feb 2013

Original figures I had were from 2009 and they were getting under $2 per hour. It's now up to $3 so the wage advantage is 6 to 1 in China's favour.



And this from a 2010 article from Stanford University's Journal of International Relations:

"Unfortunately, links to Chinese manufacturing raise the specter of dubious environmental practices. While the prospect of used solar panels looms somewhere on the horizon of American consumers, villagers in China are forced to grapple with the toxic effects of solar-grade silicon production today. The Washington Post reported these side effects in a recent article that spotlighted a small village in the central province of Henan overcome by a steady flow of silicon tetrachloride, a byproduct of the polysilicon manufactured by Luoyang Zhonggui, a nearby subsidiary of the solar behemoth Suntech...Why hasn’t any action been taken to prevent this pollution? On top of the Chinese government’s underlying aversion to environmental regulations, the Post reports that “there's such a severe shortage of polysilicon that the government is willing to overlook this issue for now.”

http://www.stanford.edu/group/sjir/pdf/Solar_11.2.pdf

There would be no way a practice like this would be tolerated in the U.S. before someone would be screaming bloody murder.

There's space for saving in battery and inverter technologies as well. AtheistCrusader Feb 2013 #1
The balance of system costs in the US really need work kristopher Feb 2013 #2
What do you mean by 'steered' anyway. ... CRH Feb 2013 #4
'Steered' means it follows the sun for improved efficiency. AtheistCrusader Feb 2013 #5
Thank you for the thorough explanation, n/t CRH Feb 2013 #7
China's government is not owned by international petroleum corporations nt msongs Feb 2013 #3
But it is run by slave labor dbackjon Feb 2013 #8
Not at all... kristopher Feb 2013 #11
Can you prove that? dbackjon Feb 2013 #12
Another nuclear fan that is allergic to hard data... nt kristopher Feb 2013 #17
Since you never provide hard data, LMAO at you dbackjon Feb 2013 #18
That's what they'll sell them for... FBaggins Feb 2013 #6
But don't bitch when U.S. manufacturers shut down OnlinePoker Feb 2013 #9
Do you have any actual data to back up your claims? kristopher Feb 2013 #10
Try Google. Anyone with a brain and an open mind knows this. dbackjon Feb 2013 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author NNadir Feb 2013 #14
Slight exageration on wages OnlinePoker Feb 2013 #15
That I knew but it doesn't quantify the impact on final price. kristopher Feb 2013 #16
Environmental factors are the largest contributor to costs. joshcryer Feb 2013 #19
No, they aren't - it isn't even a factor big enough to count. kristopher Feb 2013 #20
That's not an environmental response, that's an economics response. joshcryer Feb 2013 #21
You made an inaccurate argument about the economic effect of environmental regulation. kristopher Feb 2013 #22
And you returned with nothing about the environment. joshcryer Feb 2013 #23
Once more for the hard of hearing kristopher Feb 2013 #24
The external costs of pollution are not "virtually nil." joshcryer Feb 2013 #25
. kristopher Feb 2013 #26
Pollution has a long term economic effect, kristopher. joshcryer Feb 2013 #27
that's not what you were talking about kristopher Feb 2013 #28
They have to pay the piper either way. joshcryer Feb 2013 #29
It seems like only yesterday that $1/watt was the Holy Grail of solar... kristopher Feb 2013 #30
A review of China's progress in the last 22 months kristopher Feb 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Chinese Companies Project...»Reply #15