HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Environment & Energy » Environment & Energy (Group) » Gives me hope » Reply #5
In the discussion thread: Gives me hope [View all]

Response to Optimistic Crone (Reply #4)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:59 AM

5. That graph looks about right for relative prices in the U.S.

although with the spelling "levelised" I'm assuming you're referencing a U.K.source.

It's only showing part of the picture. In the US, the levelized price of PV solar is 30% higher than nuclear; utility solar and offshore wind are 150% higher. Onshore wind is cheaper when you can get it, when you can't it requires natural gas backup. This is why natural gas magnates like T. Boone Pickens are enthralled with so-called " renewables" - they guarantee a market for their groundwater- and atmosphere- fouling product for decades to come.

Most importantly, and despite the clever statistical juggling of wind and solar enthusiasts, those sources have not a remote chance of meeting global energy needs. I wish it weren't so but it is so, resoundingly and conclusively, and continuing to wish on that star is insanity at this point.

Nuclear is virtually carbon-free; despite hyperventilating media reports it's the safest form of baseload energy generation available, and per unit of energy it has the smallest environmental footprint by far.

U.S. Dept. of Energy levelized cost of generation through 2018:


Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 5 replies Author Time Post
Kolesar Jun 2013 OP
Optimistic Crone Jun 2013 #1
kristopher Jun 2013 #2
wtmusic Jun 2013 #3
Optimistic Crone Jun 2013 #4
LineLineLineNew Reply That graph looks about right for relative prices in the U.S.
wtmusic Jun 2013 #5
Please login to view edit histories.