Environment & Energy

madokie

(51,076 posts)

22. How do you come to the conclusion that everyone who doesn't agree with you

Sat Dec 28, 2013, 07:36 PM

Dec 2013

doesn't understand the 2nd law of Thermodynamics? I mean this is shit most of us picked up before we graduated from high school.
You make me laugh and I mean that as at you not with you.

You are about to wear poor old Dr. Hansen out don't you think. Is he the only Scientist you know or read by any chance
Give it a rest Pam, I don't think anyone here actually believes you are a scientist, I know I sure the hell don't.
I've noticed that in the majority of replies you feel you have to remind us that you are a scientist, in fact you use that as a debating tool, not cool
I'm sorry but I just don't believe you, never did for that matter, probably never will.

Anyways I'm off to the bowling alley for some down time and hell I might even drink a beer. Something I rarely do now a days.
Peace
Have a wonderful evening

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Carbon-Free Energy Is Possible -- Without Nukes [View all] kristopher Dec 2013 OP

This message was self-deleted by its author elocs Dec 2013 #1

Nuclear makes it far more difficult kristopher Dec 2013 #2

National Renewable Energy Lab's 'Renewable Electricity Futures Study' kristopher Dec 2013 #3

"Our report became the basis of President Carter's energy policy." bananas Dec 2013 #4

I believe things are different today; take the of evaluation of the CEO of NRG kristopher Dec 2013 #5

BS alert here 4dsc Dec 2013 #6

Care to educate us? n/t cprise Dec 2013 #7

It's likely the same old spin FBaggins Dec 2013 #8

What is carbon "free" PamW Dec 2013 #9

So is making cement madokie Dec 2013 #13

I don't think that's it. kristopher Dec 2013 #10

I'll take your word for it. FBaggins Dec 2013 #11

No, I support a 'path' that is well documented as most effective kristopher Dec 2013 #12

Well documented by WHO? PamW Dec 2013 #14

We can start with posts #1 & #3. kristopher Dec 2013 #16

NO such thing has been established PamW Dec 2013 #18

No, I'm saying you aren't a scientist because you falsely report the results of research and data. kristopher Dec 2013 #19

My reporting is ACCURATE PamW Dec 2013 #20

ROFLMAO kristopher Dec 2013 #21

How do you come to the conclusion that everyone who doesn't agree with you madokie Dec 2013 #22

You misunderstand.. PamW Dec 2013 #23

Show me a link where I got it wrong madokie Dec 2013 #24

Good for the goose; good for the gander PamW Dec 2013 #25

Well the goose didn't find any links to back up your absurd statements madokie Dec 2013 #26

PamW you're always throwing around all this about how you're a scientist and all madokie Dec 2013 #27

Evidently madokie doesn't understand PamW Dec 2013 #28

LOL Sure you do madokie Dec 2013 #30

Yeah! You don't understand. kristopher Dec 2013 #29

The pseudo scientist has about wore me out madokie Dec 2013 #31

We can't all be geniuses... PamW Dec 2013 #33

LOL madokie Dec 2013 #34

Nothing erratic PamW Dec 2013 #32

Nice straw man apporach to your failed attempts 4dsc Dec 2013 #15

You're funny. kristopher Dec 2013 #17

Cost-minimized combinations renewables powering the grid up to 99.9% of the time kristopher Dec 2013 #35

Not a good reference Searay60 Dec 2013 #36

It's an outstanding reference kristopher Dec 2013 #37

Read The Paper Again Searay60 Dec 2013 #38

As I wrote, it's an outstanding reference. kristopher Dec 2013 #39

Kristopher Searay60 Dec 2013 #40

Those are baseless claims kristopher Dec 2013 #41

My posts was factual, practical and experienced. Searay60 Dec 2013 #42

It's amazing... kristopher Dec 2013 #43

You Think A Lot Of Your Self Searay60 Dec 2013 #44

Yeah, yeah yeah... kristopher Dec 2013 #45

LOL Searay60 Dec 2013 #46

Unfortunately... PamW Dec 2013 #47

Talking to yourself again? kristopher Dec 2013 #48

Not at all PamW Dec 2013 #49