Carbon-Free Energy Is Possible -- Without Nukes

[kristopher]

43. It's amazing...

...how your style of argumentation so precisely tracks that other poster I mentioned earlier.

You: "I am no more anonymous than you."
I never argued by appeal to my own supposed authority, but you did.

You: "You are the one that wanted to drop names I just obliged."
It was your specific suggestion to "look at the author (sic) and where the paper was published" as part of your obvious attempt to undermine the findings of the paper - findings that are a refutation of the primary claim nuclear and coal try to use against variable renewables.
As it turns out, the credentials of the authors are excellent and the journal they published in is very well regarded. Wellinghoff's comments regarding Kempton's work are a matter of public record. But your boastful self promotion and lack of recognition of the limitations of this venue are absolutely remarkable. They track that other person so closely and in so many ways the chance that it is a coincidence is rapidly diminishing to the point of nothingness.

Your entire comment

"I would also look at the author and where the paper was published. If the paper were a seminole work you would expect PSERC or IEEE as the published forum. The paper was rejected by the IEEE as nothing new. There have been many papers presented on this subject with the same or similar scope. The paper does not provide necessary information on numerical or simulation method required by pier review in the power standards industry.

You also seem to have the same fixation on stalking me that the other poster exhibited.