Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(29,798 posts)

9. A little bit late for that isn't it?

Tue Dec 31, 2013, 11:07 AM

Dec 2013

You were trying to defend nuclear by laying the Conservatives actions off on coal but you forgot they are both part of a single coal/nuclear package.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

2010: Subsidy for eight nuclear reactors rejected kristopher Dec 2013 #2

This is criminal. nt bananas Dec 2013 #3

Uh, they predicted a drop, it dropped, and they sabatoged it? joshcryer Dec 2013 #4

That could have been more clear kristopher Dec 2013 #5

They expected the cut. The cut was obvious. joshcryer Dec 2013 #6

Uh, no, the cut benifitted coal. joshcryer Dec 2013 #8

A little bit late for that isn't it? kristopher Dec 2013 #9

I'm pretty sure none of my statements defend coal. joshcryer Jan 2014 #10

So you contend that new nuclear will be built? joshcryer Jan 2014 #13

Says longtime diehard nuclear advocate joshcryer... kristopher Jan 2014 #14

Who cares what they try to do. joshcryer Jan 2014 #15

Who care what someone who spends all their time... kristopher Jan 2014 #16

Does not parse. joshcryer Jan 2014 #17

Then you should feel right at home with it kristopher Jan 2014 #18

No, seriously, you OK? joshcryer Jan 2014 #19