HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Environment & Energy » Environment & Energy (Group) » Question to you smart peo... » Reply #44

Response to SheilaT (Reply #27)

Wed Apr 29, 2015, 04:59 AM

44. No, not directly but indirectly it becomes a "Possibly".

 

The fractional increase in temperature that will cause so much harm to so many creatures
(including humans) is totally insignificant so the idea that this extra heat will (a) penetrate
and (b) influence the heat balance of the planet is a complete non-starter. It is not just a
surface effect but a "tiny, tiny sliver of the surface" effect and so neither competes with
nor affects the massive energy flows within the planet proper - certainly not down to the
mantle.

The forces behind earthquakes of this nature (pardon the pun) are phenomenally large,
truly hard to understand in human terms. The energies contained, transmitted and released
by earth engine events (volcanoes, earthquakes, tectonics in general) are almost impossible
to comprehend unless you've spent some time looking into that field.

However, when a bullet is fired from a gun, the energy transmitted in that last fraction of
an inch of trigger movement is totally out of proportion to the energy released to project
the bullet - the indirect effect of tiny changes can indeed have large & widespread impacts.
(One could make the analogy with the last ounce of pressure on the trigger of a handgun in
Sarajevo and the resulting years of World War I - "the bullet that killed 16 million people".)

A small reduction in ice thickness over a large area means that a significant weight has
been removed during a blink of geological time. The rebound of that section of the crust
due to the rapid change in forces upon it affects the adjoining crust and any faults now
have also had a change of the forces previously locking them in place.

Added to this, there are two other effects: the "ripple" of change that spreads out,
weakening all of the time but still potentially (and historically proven) powerful enough
to affect any contacted "trigger point" in order to effectively propagate the event; and
the "ringing" effect where the shock from a major earth event (volcano, earthquake)
reverberates around the planet (i.e., not just to adjoining areas but through deeper
transmission paths).

Whether these changes are sufficient to release (cause) earthquakes in a *particular* case
is beyond our ability to accurately determine but in practice, it can and it does have this
capability in general so yes, the ongoing rush to the cliff of Chaos is even having effects
of a far greater nature than "just a change in temperature".

That doesn't mean that *this* earthquake was "caused" (or even "triggered" by human
activity but, as the scale of the impact continues to increase, the frequency & scale of
earthquakes *will* be affected thanks to "Business As Usual" winning out.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 68 replies Author Time Post
marym625 Apr 2015 OP
NV Whino Apr 2015 #1
marym625 Apr 2015 #5
OKIsItJustMe Apr 2015 #45
marym625 Apr 2015 #46
OKIsItJustMe Apr 2015 #47
marym625 Apr 2015 #48
OKIsItJustMe Apr 2015 #49
marym625 May 2015 #58
daleanime Apr 2015 #2
marym625 Apr 2015 #6
questionseverything Apr 2015 #28
marym625 Apr 2015 #35
TreasonousBastard Apr 2015 #3
marym625 Apr 2015 #7
bananas Apr 2015 #4
marym625 Apr 2015 #8
daleanime Apr 2015 #9
marym625 Apr 2015 #10
SheilaT Apr 2015 #26
marym625 Apr 2015 #31
Travis_0004 Apr 2015 #38
marym625 Apr 2015 #39
SheilaT Apr 2015 #42
marym625 May 2015 #59
SheilaT May 2015 #65
marym625 May 2015 #66
marym625 May 2015 #62
Binkie The Clown Apr 2015 #15
marym625 Apr 2015 #36
Travis_0004 Apr 2015 #40
marym625 Apr 2015 #41
Maedhros Apr 2015 #51
mopinko Apr 2015 #11
marym625 Apr 2015 #12
dbackjon Apr 2015 #19
mopinko Apr 2015 #20
dbackjon Apr 2015 #21
mopinko Apr 2015 #23
dbackjon Apr 2015 #24
kristopher Apr 2015 #13
marym625 Apr 2015 #14
Binkie The Clown Apr 2015 #16
Binkie The Clown Apr 2015 #18
marym625 Apr 2015 #29
Binkie The Clown Apr 2015 #30
marym625 Apr 2015 #37
mackdaddy Apr 2015 #17
Optical.Catalyst Apr 2015 #22
Boomer Apr 2015 #25
marym625 Apr 2015 #33
bloom Apr 2015 #53
marym625 Apr 2015 #34
SheilaT Apr 2015 #27
marym625 Apr 2015 #32
SheilaT Apr 2015 #43
LineLineReply No, not directly but indirectly it becomes a "Possibly".
Nihil Apr 2015 #44
marym625 May 2015 #60
truebrit71 Apr 2015 #50
marym625 May 2015 #55
Cleita Apr 2015 #52
marym625 May 2015 #56
Boomer May 2015 #54
marym625 May 2015 #57
Boomer May 2015 #61
cilla4progress May 2015 #63
marym625 May 2015 #64
cilla4progress May 2015 #67
marym625 May 2015 #68
Please login to view edit histories.