Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(33,512 posts)
7. I am reporting from one of the world's premier scientific journals, including of course...
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 07:20 AM
Mar 2016

Last edited Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:19 AM - Edit history (1)

...a little sarcasm about the stupidity of "investing" close to a trillion dollars in ten years on the useless, expensive, and toxic solar industry.

What I get from the people who still support this tragedy, in spite of the obvious failure of this faith based "plan" to address the collapse of the planetary atmosphere, is even more whining, about the sarcasm, and predictably, no comment on the science.

This is to be expected. The people who endorse continuing with this failed scheme despite of its results show, if anything, their disinterest in the environment in particular, and science in general.

It's interesting, by the way, since this paper refers to China. that we never hear from the purveyors of this absurd scheme to run the world on energy that's available for a few hours a day - if that - about the cadmium pollution in China, now effecting ten percent of the total rice crop in the Southern part of that country.

They'll burn all kinds of gas and coal to run computers to complain about an atom of cesium-134 in a tuna fish, and not a word about the food supply of hundreds of millions of human beings.

I am very pleased to oppose the solar industry. If most people can't think, someone who can think must make every effort to do so For a little under a trillion bucks in ten years, it's had no effect, absolutely none, on the environmental disaster before us.

I am also very pleased to engage, whenever possible, in my long term moral crusade to confront the stupidity and ignorance directed against the world's largest, still by far, source of climate change gas free primary energy.

Have a nice day today.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Nature: The Planet May ...»Reply #7