Northing, absoluitely, nothing can possibly be "a better way to go" than the only commercialized new form of energy discovered in the last two thousand years by the finest minds of the 20th century.
The supposition is that nuclear energy, and only nuclear energy, needs to be absolutely risk free, or everything else can kill at will.
Nuclear energy need not be perfect and without risk to be vastly superior to everything else. It only needs to be vastly superior to everything else, which it is.
You asked why the world's carbon dioxide accumulations are accelerating at a rate practically beyond comprehension, I provided an answer, and without any deeper analysis, you rejected it based on faith and supposition.
Within that last statement of yours, multiplied by the unsupportable belief of billions of people -that so called "renewable energy," which was, after all abandoned by humanity nearly two centuries ago because most people lived short miserable lives, is sustainable - lies the real answer to the question.
So called "renewable energy" hasn't been sustainable, it isn't sustainable, and it won't be sustainable.
Have a nice day.