* lots of bullshit is what has been spread about Gaza, just an FYI, if you have not read it before:
Last April President Bush said that Israels withdrawal from Gaza would allow the establishment of a democratic state in the Gaza and open the door for democracy in the Middle East. The columnist Thomas Friedman was more explicit, arguing that the issue for Palestinians is no longer about how they resist the Israeli occupation in Gaza, but whether they build a decent mini-state there a Dubai on the Mediterranean. Because if they do, it will fundamentally reshape the Israeli debate about whether the Palestinians can be handed most of the West Bank.
Embedded in these statements is the assumption that Palestinians will be free to build their own democracy, that Israel will eventually cede the West Bank (or at least consider the possibility), that Israels withdrawal will strengthen the Palestinian position in negotiations over the West Bank, that the occupation will end or become increasingly irrelevant, that the gross asymmetries between the two sides will be redressed. Hence, the Gaza Disengagement Plan if implemented properly provides a real (perhaps the only) opportunity for resolving the conflict and creating a Palestinian state. It follows that Palestinians will be responsible for the success or failure of the Plan: if they fail to build a democratic or decent mini-state in Gaza, the fault will be theirs alone.