Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

William Seger

(10,775 posts)
39. I actually take some small comfort
Thu Dec 24, 2015, 01:02 PM
Dec 2015

... from knowing that such a small percentage of structural engineers (which are actually only a few dozen out of that 2409) are that irrational and incompetent. That means that if you needed the services of a structural engineer, there is only a very minute chance that you'd end up with one that dumb. Having an incompetent doctor is a far more serious problem.

Zero! William Seger Mar 2015 #1
you wished! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #3
growing library of peer-reviewed technical papers Jeroen Nov 2015 #26
Sure William Seger Nov 2015 #27
Thanks Jeroen Nov 2015 #28
"no explosives were active during the collapses" William Seger Nov 2015 #29
Classic, controlled demolition Jeroen Nov 2015 #30
I don't have any problem with people who "question the official narrative" William Seger Nov 2015 #31
Numbers are fun! zappaman Mar 2015 #2
? OBenario Oct 2015 #6
now 2354. and climbing. n/t wildbilln864 May 2015 #4
Holy crap! zappaman May 2015 #5
Do you imagine there'ssome significance to the percentage? wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #7
I'm so glad you asked, here's some homework so you might answer your own questions honestly. greyl Oct 2015 #8
wasn't asking you but perhaps you could answer in your own words? wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #9
Wrong, false, and untrue. You did ask, "What do you account for the percentage...yada yada" greyl Oct 2015 #11
2366? Up 12 in the last 6 months? William Seger Oct 2015 #10
up yes. wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #12
You ignore attrition. Many former "truthers" have discovered they were lied to William Seger Oct 2015 #13
your post has so many false assertions William. But you know that. n/t wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #14
No, I don't know that, and apparently neither do you William Seger Oct 2015 #18
you assert that no one could have... wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #19
24/7!? No... wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #15
yep! wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #16
Oh, the magical delayed remote action bombs? William Seger Oct 2015 #17
yeah there you go making up shit again. wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #22
Give it up wildbilln864, GGJohn Oct 2015 #20
yea well I'll be here to remind them... wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #21
Here? On a chat board? GGJohn Oct 2015 #23
doesn't seem to slow you down any. wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #24
Spread the word where ever you go? GGJohn Oct 2015 #25
+1000 nt Logical Nov 2015 #32
C'mon now... zappaman Nov 2015 #33
2,374 n/t wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #34
2409! wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #35
Weird argument whitefordmd Dec 2015 #36
not an argument wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #37
So your posting a fact, but not trying to make a point? Very sensible. eom whitefordmd Dec 2015 #38
I actually take some small comfort William Seger Dec 2015 #39
I used to work with a Structural Engineer that was neck deep into all sorts of woo. whitefordmd Dec 2015 #40
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»2335! update: 2416, upda...»Reply #39