Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 2335! update: 2416, update: 2444! new update: 2613 and growing! [View all]William Seger
(10,775 posts)39. I actually take some small comfort
... from knowing that such a small percentage of structural engineers (which are actually only a few dozen out of that 2409) are that irrational and incompetent. That means that if you needed the services of a structural engineer, there is only a very minute chance that you'd end up with one that dumb. Having an incompetent doctor is a far more serious problem.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't have any problem with people who "question the official narrative"
William Seger
Nov 2015
#31
I'm so glad you asked, here's some homework so you might answer your own questions honestly.
greyl
Oct 2015
#8
Wrong, false, and untrue. You did ask, "What do you account for the percentage...yada yada"
greyl
Oct 2015
#11
You ignore attrition. Many former "truthers" have discovered they were lied to
William Seger
Oct 2015
#13
I used to work with a Structural Engineer that was neck deep into all sorts of woo.
whitefordmd
Dec 2015
#40