Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

The Doctor.

(17,266 posts)
74. Your 'advice' is irrelevant. I want links. You don't have them.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 05:38 AM
Nov 2012

You can't back up a gawd damned thing you claim about that paper.

If I were in such a position of fail, that would make me throw tantrums too.

Lucky for me I don't put myself in indefensible positions.
Osama Confession Video [View all] cpwm17 Oct 2012 OP
One way or another, we're being lied to. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #1
Osama and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed were happy to take credit for 9-11 cpwm17 Oct 2012 #2
Wow. Nice attempt to sidestep reason. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #3
Your argument is based on who has the motivation to lie cpwm17 Oct 2012 #6
If I go into your house, The Doctor. Oct 2012 #8
Since when did I call the video itself hard evidence that Osama did 9-11? cpwm17 Oct 2012 #10
Again, you use troll tactics. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #11
Actually, no nano-thermite was found at the site. zappaman Oct 2012 #12
Unlike the poor sods out there who believe the garbage in your link, The Doctor. Oct 2012 #13
Read it when it came out zappaman Oct 2012 #14
Insinuation without links, evidence, or excerpts is a troll tactic. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #41
You read the entire document William Seger Oct 2012 #16
Really? Which page and paragraph? The Doctor. Oct 2012 #19
Google is your friend William Seger Oct 2012 #20
Awesome! The Doctor. Oct 2012 #22
I'll take that as a concession William Seger Oct 2012 #29
You're a constant source of amusement. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #31
So, you didn't read post #16, huh? William Seger Oct 2012 #34
You mean the post where you make a bunch of assertions The Doctor. Oct 2012 #37
Hmmmm.. William Seger Oct 2012 #42
The reason you shouldn't bother is either that you can't find them, The Doctor. Oct 2012 #47
What a pantload William Seger Oct 2012 #48
Amazing. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #51
LMFAO! William Seger Oct 2012 #55
So I say 'you have nothing', and ask for the *actual* refutations of the paper.... The Doctor. Oct 2012 #65
I see you didn't take my advice. What a surprise. William Seger Oct 2012 #69
Your 'advice' is irrelevant. I want links. You don't have them. The Doctor. Nov 2012 #74
Who do you think you're kidding? You apparently don't read links William Seger Nov 2012 #81
William says the video is not hard evidence. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #9
"It appears your argument is with him, not me." William Seger Oct 2012 #17
We got here because in another thread I said that there is no hard evidence The Doctor. Oct 2012 #18
"There is no 'evidence' of a confession" ?! William Seger Oct 2012 #21
It's a simple question: The Doctor. Oct 2012 #23
I called it a confession video because that is what it has already been called. cpwm17 Oct 2012 #24
You seem conflicted. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #25
You seem to be having difficulty with the English Language and very simple concepts. cpwm17 Oct 2012 #30
Strange question William Seger Oct 2012 #27
I'm just trying to get a clear answer. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #33
I'm beginning to think your main problem is reading comprehension William Seger Oct 2012 #35
So a video of someone bragging about comitting a crime is not hard evidence? The Doctor. Oct 2012 #38
BY ITSELF, the video "proves" nothing William Seger Oct 2012 #43
Here in reality, people are indicted, tried, and convicted on the strength The Doctor. Oct 2012 #45
Your faulty logic, arrogant assertions, and outright distortions of what's been said in this thread William Seger Oct 2012 #49
Calling a duck a tank doesn't make it one. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #53
Oh, so you think maybe bin Laden might have painted the buildings with exploding paint? William Seger Oct 2012 #56
More bullshit. How tiresome. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #66
More irony. How humorous. William Seger Oct 2012 #72
Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #75
Why would I alert on your funniest post yet? William Seger Nov 2012 #80
"The Doctor" is no longer with us. Quantess Dec 2012 #88
What.... Frank_Norris_Lives Dec 2012 #89
Where to begin? Quantess Dec 2012 #90
Was it this.... Frank_Norris_Lives Dec 2012 #91
Check out Meta-discussion cpwm17 Dec 2012 #93
Ok... Frank_Norris_Lives Dec 2012 #92
"Facts" ? William Seger Oct 2012 #5
LMAO! You've just proven beyond doubt that you can't be taken seriously. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #7
What you just did there is called "logical reasoning" huh? William Seger Oct 2012 #15
Again, you fail. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #26
Again, you fail to provide any cogent response to valid criticism William Seger Oct 2012 #28
If you want to provide a 'cogent' argument, The Doctor. Oct 2012 #32
Thanks again William Seger Oct 2012 #36
This should be amusing. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #39
Why should I expect that explaining it a fourth time would make a difference? William Seger Oct 2012 #44
Yer just about off the deep end here. I don't recall telling Tombs anything in person. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #46
Yes, you've convinced me that you'll keep repeating the same nonsense over and over William Seger Oct 2012 #59
If the FBI says it's not hard evidence, then it's a fact. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #67
That's rather authoritarian of you to accept the FBI so righteously, The Doctor. Bolo Boffin Oct 2012 #68
So now you believe there is a conspiracy theory that the FBI dismisses hard evidence? The Doctor. Nov 2012 #76
That video was shot with a PAL-format camera William Seger Oct 2012 #4
So I state in another thread that the FBI does not consider this video The Doctor. Oct 2012 #40
William Seger doesn't agree with you at all cpwm17 Oct 2012 #50
Well, he wants it both ways. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #52
All of you have a good point Spoopy Oct 2012 #54
You're using reason. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #58
Oh, bullshit William Seger Oct 2012 #60
You've divested yourself of the reality upon which my reasoning was based. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #64
Huh. You already asked him that. AZCat Oct 2012 #70
In the first place, "confession" should be in quotes William Seger Oct 2012 #71
So the video is not a confession? The Doctor. Nov 2012 #73
LOL, what about your "logical reasoning" that the video was fake? (n/t) William Seger Nov 2012 #82
All you have is an ambiguous statement spoken by an single FBI agent, cpwm17 Oct 2012 #61
Ambiguous? Are you that fucking stupid? The Doctor. Nov 2012 #77
Incredible claims require incredible evidence cpwm17 Nov 2012 #83
You are using the argument from authority cpwm17 Oct 2012 #57
If you can't understand the words "hard evidence" when they are put together, The Doctor. Nov 2012 #79
You've gone out of your way to avoid discussing your evidence for CD's cpwm17 Nov 2012 #85
Wait.... Frank_Norris_Lives Oct 2012 #62
At first, when Osama thought his ass was on the line, he said he didn't do it. cpwm17 Oct 2012 #63
Oh, Awesome! So when did he claim responsibility? The Doctor. Nov 2012 #78
I already showed you a link concerning Osama's claims of responsibility for 9-11 cpwm17 Nov 2012 #84
That explanation seems... Frank_Norris_Lives Nov 2012 #86
Osama did publicly take credit for 9-11. cpwm17 Nov 2012 #87
Room for doubt Spoopy Dec 2012 #94
As I wrote above, the "Confession Video" wasn't the only time Osama talked of his involvement cpwm17 Dec 2012 #95
Except there was no evidence that words were was bin Laden's... KDLarsen Dec 2012 #96
That interview was filed on 28th September 2001 cpwm17 Dec 2012 #97
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Osama Confession Video»Reply #74