Because you aren't very good at describing my actual state of mind when I post here. As a tool to insult and shame me, it works quite well for you. But that seems to be its only validity, and as such you are advised to keep your projections of my emotions to yourself. Since I an the only person here who can accurately portray my emotions, you should leave the mindreading to the psychics.
So what's left to respond to in this odd reply to my OP?
No, Octafish's report on a conspiracy theory conference belongs here in CS. You would be as capable of reading it here as there. It would lose none of its informative qualities being posted in the group it belongs in.
By the way, as a "host" of creative speculation, who coined that gem in DU's discussion category... Did you get to do that as one of the "hosts", BB?
I have no idea what you mean by this. I didn't write the terms of service, I didn't write the SOPs for any forum or group here, and I had no party in making any of the forums or groups here. The administrators did not consult me when they named this group Creative Speculation. They did not ask my opinion when they wrote the terms of service. I had no part in this as a host (no need for scare quotes, I actually am one of the hosts here). My being a host happened after DU 3 opened its doors with all this already in place. I am sorry if this disappoints you, but I can offer no remedy for the truth.
So now we are down to Dictabelt or not. The Dictabelt is the part of the story we are talking about in this thread. That you would continue to believe a conspiracy killed JFK anyway is something I had already suspected. Now that that's out of the way, what do you have to say about the subject at hand?
= new reply since forum marked as read
