Mark Crispin Miller, Truther, on 9/11 Free Fall with Andrew Steele

[William Seger]

6. I didn't say it's "correct" or that I know

... but if nationalize the fed insists on an answer to his question, yeah, I'll go with the most obvious one until given some reason to prefer a different one. The point is, you can't just presume that the reason was that they were afraid of spilling the beans about the magical silent explosives they planted all over the WTC, and then use that same presumption as evidence that that's what they did. There are perfectly plausible theories about a real conspiracy to cover up the intelligence failures and the hijackers' Saudi backing, but since they are both plausible and substantive, they aren't properly called "conspiracy theories." As I've said before, the "truth movement" does nothing but distract from serious issues.