Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LGBT

dballance

(5,756 posts)

3. Thanks.

Reply to COLGATE4 (Reply #1)

Tue Dec 10, 2013, 10:39 PM

Dec 2013

I thought that was the case, but since corporate personhood has been running rampant these days I thought it might be good to parallel the argument in terms of corps being a person.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here's why the baker in CO lost before the Administrative Law Judge on the issue of same-sex cake [View all] dballance Dec 2013 OP

No need to try to argue implied consent COLGATE4 Dec 2013 #1

Thanks. dballance Dec 2013 #3

Shorter version: "Corporations are not human beings. Human beings have human rights, corporations nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #2

^^^^^this. see movetoamend.org dballance Dec 2013 #4

People do not lose their rights by being organized into a corporation. n/t Old Union Guy Dec 2013 #6

You are correct. Nor to corps become human by being incorporated. dballance Dec 2013 #7

It's important to note that this decision was based on a Colorado statute Jim Lane Dec 2013 #5