HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Health » Addiction & Recovery (Group) » My journal about addictio... » Reply #18
In the discussion thread: My journal about addiction [View all]

Response to notawinger (Reply #17)

Tue May 3, 2016, 08:02 AM

18. Thx! Its not ever going to get easy. But it is not impossible either. Well at least not if you dont

stumble around in complete darkness as seems to be what happens a lot.

Having moved the site yesterday (server problems..) i'm now back to writing and rewriting again.

I am going to have a go at the 4 stroke structure from a slightly more technical angle:

DD -> EFC -> RE -> ST -> DD....

Where:
DD = Delay Discounting or the tendency towards short term thinking/acting
EFC= Emotion Focused Coping or the tendency towards mending mood instead of mending practical situation
RE = Reduced Environment, or the tendency to make your life situation worse by your actions, and
ST = Stress, that shift your brain into short term thinking and DD.

The more technical version of the four phases will allow me to draw upon more established sources and give the model a better anchoring in biological and psychological thinking.

I also want to have another go at the link between shame and addiction: After just a quick glance is not at all clear why these should be connected, but when you start to consider that pretending and other "appearance management" is a big drain on regulation resources it becomes a bit less strange.

I was also reminded about the work on "Stigma" by Erwin Goffman way back in the 70'ties. My feeling is that the present models of addiction have big glaring hole just where the impact of your personal environment should be. KabathZinn and his stress model does a bit to help fill that gap, but he is a bit short on details. Perhaps I'm missing something, but at least I'm on the hunt for a better alternative.

In the medical model of addiction you don't need to account for any impact of the personal environment, because on that model addictive drugs are what makes you addicted.

So a central thing to argue is the impact of environment vs. the impact of drugs on self regulation capacity. As most people don't know much about brain physiology or executive function the medical model has won favor rather unopposed. That could change though.

So much to do.....











Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 21 replies Author Time Post
Jemmons Mar 2016 OP
notawinger Mar 2016 #1
Jemmons Mar 2016 #3
Jemmons Mar 2016 #4
Jemmons Mar 2016 #2
notawinger Mar 2016 #5
Jemmons Apr 2016 #7
Jemmons Apr 2016 #6
Iggo Apr 2016 #8
Jemmons Apr 2016 #9
Iggo Apr 2016 #10
Jemmons Apr 2016 #11
Jemmons Apr 2016 #13
Electric Monk Apr 2016 #12
Jemmons Apr 2016 #14
Jemmons Apr 2016 #15
Jemmons Apr 2016 #16
notawinger May 2016 #17
LineLineLineNew Reply Thx! Its not ever going to get easy. But it is not impossible either. Well at least not if you dont
Jemmons May 2016 #18
notawinger May 2016 #19
Jemmons May 2016 #20
Stuart G Jun 2016 #21
Please login to view edit histories.