to make something simple into something complex and it is obvious that you really are unsure of the science involved.
I have shown that acetone cannot produce (through a redox reaction) an acid which is required to produce a reading on a breatholizer (point b. above).
You have stated without any proof that a low blood sugar can produce ketones in sufficient quantity to have an effect. This is absurd. And even if it did, acetone doesn't have the atomic make-up to do what you want it to do.
If the subject of the OP was malnurished then why was he working in a warehouse and smoking cigars?
If the subject of the OP was drinking adult beverages then the breatholizer did it's job correctly (a fair conclusion to draw).
Throughout this entire conversation I keep asking myself why was the BAC test performed in the first place? Why, if the patient had an unmet medical need, was this not being addressed? Why is this information not being disclosed? Your whole argument is literally based on wild guesses and the precise alignment of 3/4 the stars in the entire galaxy at a single point in time. You accuse me of not knowing the difference between hyper... and hypo... when it is obvious that you have no idea what you are talking about. Personally I think you are trying out a novel argument to see what kind of opposition it might face in a scientific debate. Which is fine if you enjoy making yourself look foolish.
So for that reason....
Have a nice day.