Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ancestry/Genealogy

LeftInTX

(25,258 posts)

4. Unfortunately, the slave stuff is true

Reply to radical noodle (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 27, 2017, 01:58 AM

Nov 2017

It was direct lineage. My grandmother's great-grandfather. It was in the 1850 census. He was 24 and owned a 25 yo and 8 yo slave.

As for the French stuff...who knows..right?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Family Search.org [View all] LeftInTX Nov 2017 OP

Just be careful with that site radical noodle Nov 2017 #1

Unfortunately, the slave stuff is true LeftInTX Nov 2017 #4

I'm sure it's in the ancestry of many of us n/t radical noodle Nov 2017 #5

I agree...be careful with this site. The info is only as good as those providing it airmid Nov 2017 #8

I came across someone who had done a family tree on a branch of my family tree applegrove Nov 2017 #2

Another vote to be careful csziggy Nov 2017 #3

Too good to be true - LOL LeftInTX Nov 2017 #6

Yeah, it is so tempting to believe some of those trees csziggy Nov 2017 #9

Don't discount a connection based on the spelling of a name HeiressofBickworth May 2018 #12

Yeah, I would be very very careful of any information you get from unsourced family trees Spider Jerusalem Nov 2017 #7

In my ancestry research, I found slaveowners in NY,NJ,CT, RI, and Massachusetts wishstar Nov 2017 #10

I looked up John Winslow's family tree LeftInTX Nov 2017 #11

I'm so pleased to see the cautions about on-line trees HeiressofBickworth May 2018 #13

One more vote for caution about what you find on the web GeoWilliam750 May 2018 #14