Ok, so instead of engaging in a debate (Reply #44)

In the discussion thread: Pro-Gun Voices in Congress Are Open to Bullet Capacity Limits [View all]

Sat Feb 23, 2013, 07:22 AM

av8r1998 (265 posts)

44. Ok, so instead of engaging in a debate

..., justifying your proposals or refuting my arguments, you resort to redirection and anecdotal stories about vets with a non-specific disorder shooting road signs and neighbors pets, and blame the "gun culture".

This is where the gun control argument breaks down... it is by in large based on emotion, not fact.

Whenever a person knowledgeable about firearms proves your ideas ineffective, you resort to emotional argument.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

50 replies	Author	Time	Post
Pro-Gun Voices in Congress Are Open to Bullet Capacity Limits [View all]	SecularMotion	Feb 2013	OP
News Flash: US Senator understands polling.	Scuba	Feb 2013	#1
another misleading statement by the NYT	bossy22	Feb 2013	#2
Bullet capacity limits?	Clames	Feb 2013	#3
That was my reaction as well.	CokeMachine	Feb 2013	#10
No limits needed: my bullets can hold their liquor.	Lizzie Poppet	May 2015	#50
NYT may be in error: The Conn murderer Did in fact switch mags several times...	Eleanors38	Feb 2013	#4
This is true	av8r1998	Feb 2013	#5
Thanks for the details.	Eleanors38	Feb 2013	#6
When are you going to get in a gun fight needing to change	upaloopa	Feb 2013	#28
It's done all the time ....	oldhippie	Feb 2013	#33
Funny	av8r1998	Feb 2013	#38
Ummm.... really?	av8r1998	Feb 2013	#34
Thanks for the corrections. I don't use guns as much as you so I don't give a shit about the lingo.	upaloopa	Feb 2013	#41
Ok, so instead of engaging in a debate	av8r1998	Feb 2013	#44
Gunners don't debate they are all about winning	upaloopa	Feb 2013	#45
I am aware of that	av8r1998	Feb 2013	#46
AS for your #3	oneshooter	Feb 2013	#42
I know this too	av8r1998	Feb 2013	#43
Banning high capacity magaines a start	Nasty Jack	Feb 2013	#7
You say this is just a partial list?	Light House	Feb 2013	#8
More wish list	Nasty Jack	Feb 2013	#11
why military?	gejohnston	Feb 2013	#12
Military	Nasty Jack	Feb 2013	#15
why would you exempt military for CCW?	gejohnston	Feb 2013	#16
Military and CCW	Nasty Jack	Feb 2013	#23
civil liberties should be the same across the board	gejohnston	Feb 2013	#25
WHat "mentally ill" would need reporting?	uppityperson	Feb 2013	#9
Mentally ill reporting	Nasty Jack	Feb 2013	#13
How mentally ill do you mean? Someone being treated doing well on SSRI anti-depressants? An	uppityperson	Feb 2013	#14
Mentally ill	Nasty Jack	Feb 2013	#18
There is a federal law that covers that	gejohnston	Feb 2013	#21
Mental health law	Nasty Jack	Feb 2013	#24
actually it is enforced	gejohnston	Feb 2013	#26
People who carry guns	av8r1998	Feb 2013	#36
Please define ....	Straw Man	Feb 2013	#17
Magazine capacity	Nasty Jack	Feb 2013	#27
Post removed	Post removed	Feb 2013	#29
Then you're living in the wrong country n/t	arcane1	Feb 2013	#31
Please justify 5 rounds	av8r1998	Feb 2013	#39
Weapons of choice.	Straw Man	Feb 2013	#40
So by your definition, this is an "assault weapon"?	benEzra	May 2015	#48
There won't be any major gun control for at least 4 years.	Dr_Scholl	Feb 2013	#19
besides gerrymandering	gejohnston	Feb 2013	#20
1998 was the exception.	Dr_Scholl	Feb 2013	#22
Gun control	Nasty Jack	Feb 2013	#30
Uncontrolled?	DonP	Feb 2013	#32
Like in 1994, you mean?	benEzra	May 2015	#47
Haha	av8r1998	Feb 2013	#37
Ummm... OK	av8r1998	Feb 2013	#35
A ban on 10-to-30 round magazines would be even more politically toxic than an AWB...	benEzra	May 2015	#49

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.