Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: LOL, has anyone actually read the "universal background check" legislation that has been proposed?? [View all]petronius
(26,602 posts)21. I think it would be much better if the definitions of 'transfer' simply excluded
any/all temporary possession while in the company of the actual owner. The way it is now, they've explicitly excluded loans at the shooting range and loans while hunting, but listing those two situations leaves loans while sport shooting (not hunting) away from the range as a transfer requiring a background check. I wonder if the authors simply didn't realize how many people target shoot on public land outside of ranges, that it's not just - or even mostly - hunting that goes on outside an official shooting range?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
LOL, has anyone actually read the "universal background check" legislation that has been proposed?? [View all]
virginia mountainman
Mar 2013
OP
Do you find anything faulty with his assessment of the proposed law?
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2013
#2
To evaluate laws, ALL citizens must be lawyers. Another provision of the law.
Eleanors38
Apr 2013
#34
Only someone who is vehemently opposed to any form of gun control could like that asinine bill
tularetom
Apr 2013
#7
Great - but what about non-sales? Say I just want to "give" my gun to some perp,
jmg257
Apr 2013
#16
How about not going to federal prison? A procedure to enforce federal firearm laws
jmg257
Apr 2013
#22
Universal Background Checks are a good example, along with registration of course.
jmg257
Apr 2013
#27
I understand about gun owners ignoring the spirit of the law. AWB was a great example,
jmg257
Apr 2013
#29
Yep-let us compromise..by bribing "law-abiding" gun owners as the means to get them to...
jmg257
Apr 2013
#37
I know...I said I get it - if one is willing to break the law, then they don't worry about the law.
jmg257
Apr 2013
#41
Not now, maybe after the next massacre. I do get emotional when people get blasted by the dozens,
jmg257
Apr 2013
#52
Uh huh, which you did, all the while you were spouting the how and why you and millions others
jmg257
Apr 2013
#61
Awww..so cute! I know, this is all rather tedious, and I did mention boring too.
jmg257
Apr 2013
#71
Yep..you know those old 'criminals, by definition, break laws', 'if you outlaw guns...'
jmg257
Apr 2013
#56
Well, I don't know that 'difficult to enforce' necessarily equates to 'badly written' ...
brett_jv
Apr 2013
#54
Careful. That kind of rational thought earns labels from a few more vocal advocates.
Clames
Apr 2013
#58
I think it would be much better if the definitions of 'transfer' simply excluded
petronius
Apr 2013
#21