Gun Control & RKBA

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)

18. using the Czech Republic as a model?

Tue Jan 7, 2014, 02:46 PM

Jan 2014

there your FOID is also your CCW. If you have a FOID, or what the Canadians call a PAL, why would you need mandatory FFL transfers? I think if you get caught with gun and no FOID, the cops can trace the gun to the last 4473 and he or she can explain, or show a bill of sale to someone else, or police report of stolen property.

The 1968 GCA repealed and replaced the 1938 FFA. I would do the same with both NFA and GCA and replace it with something that is coherent and logical. One can take the best of specific provisions from different places and make something that actually makes sense.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Empire State gun owners bracing for Cuomo’s confiscation scheme [View all] SecularMotion Jan 2014 OP

Lets wish the Governor luck, it's a good start but doesn't go anywhere near far enough. bowens43 Jan 2014 #1

WOW ! I've been banned from this Forum for less, Bold & Wrong orpupilofnature57 Jan 2014 #2

banned and posting? Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #8

Yes, for 48Hrs and this is the first time since . orpupilofnature57 Jan 2014 #22

Not according to the constitution and USSC rulings Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #3

Being a member of a well regulated militia... sarisataka Jan 2014 #16

Wrong on all levels. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2014 #26

Da trifecta. Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #36

Ya gotta admit though, Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #38

I am all for stricter regulations but this is just nuts. Packerowner740 Jan 2014 #29

Wrong Dwayne Hicks Jan 2014 #39

do you ever have any comments? Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #4

You again? SecularMotion Jan 2014 #5

When was this since I have not alerted Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #7

Your need to bait and attack anyone who disagrees with you SecularMotion Jan 2014 #9

The question remains unanswered. oneshooter Jan 2014 #10

While I have no problem discussing this topic here, sarisataka Jan 2014 #17

YOU accused me of getting a post of yours hidden Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #12

You're right. You had nothing to do with the hidden post. SecularMotion Jan 2014 #14

Not even an, "I'm sorry"? oldhippie Jan 2014 #20

I'm sorry I mixed up Duckhunter935 with another gun lobbyist SecularMotion Jan 2014 #21

+1000 !!!! orpupilofnature57 Jan 2014 #24

Yes. Straw Man Jan 2014 #30

Thats OK, we all make mistakes Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #25

You wanted to question me when I said I was Banned... orpupilofnature57 Jan 2014 #31

Just curious Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #32

IIRC, a hidden post just stops you from posting in that thread. AtheistCrusader Jan 2014 #35

I know it's cold outside, but your too horny for a flame orpupilofnature57 Jan 2014 #23

why I was right Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #33

Now isn't the time to back up on basic human rights. ileus Jan 2014 #6

wish it was a less than 1 percent compliance rate RedstDem Jan 2014 #11

I would have a very hard time complying Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #13

Illustrative example of the exercise in futility that is ex post facto registration sir pball Jan 2014 #15

using the Czech Republic as a model? gejohnston Jan 2014 #18

I like FFLs because I like end-to-end traceability. sir pball Jan 2014 #19

Suddenly! the security of paper. With concern over NSA Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #37

Good for them CFLDem Jan 2014 #27

But I thought the argument in gun control was that there were no confiscations Packerowner740 Jan 2014 #28

SHHHH, he can't comment on his posts Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #34