As a convicted felon, he was ineligible to own them. (Reply #1)

Sat Jan 11, 2014, 11:29 AM

Straw Man (6,212 posts)

Therefore, they were seized. What's your point?

Oddly, though the lead-in mentions 11 firearms, the second paragraph lists only two. I wonder why.

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

8 replies	Author	Time	Post
Guns Seized at Wappapello [View all]	SecularMotion	Jan 2014	OP
As a convicted felon, he was ineligible to own them.	Straw Man	Jan 2014	#1
The 2 firearms were in his possession when he was arrested.	SecularMotion	Jan 2014	#2
Not according to the article.	Straw Man	Jan 2014	#4
Federal crime for the cut down shotgun deserves federal time.	Packerowner740	Jan 2014	#6
Yup -- no argument there.	Straw Man	Jan 2014	#7
will he be turned over to the feds	gejohnston	Jan 2014	#3
Criminals...there's just no controlling them it seems.	ileus	Jan 2014	#5
No controlling the definition of "Big News," either.	Eleanors38	Jan 2014	#8

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.