Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Straw Man

(6,622 posts)

1. As a convicted felon, he was ineligible to own them.

Reply to SecularMotion (Original post)

Sat Jan 11, 2014, 11:29 AM

Jan 2014

Therefore, they were seized. What's your point?

Oddly, though the lead-in mentions 11 firearms, the second paragraph lists only two. I wonder why.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Guns Seized at Wappapello [View all] SecularMotion Jan 2014 OP

As a convicted felon, he was ineligible to own them. Straw Man Jan 2014 #1

The 2 firearms were in his possession when he was arrested. SecularMotion Jan 2014 #2

Not according to the article. Straw Man Jan 2014 #4

Federal crime for the cut down shotgun deserves federal time. Packerowner740 Jan 2014 #6

Yup -- no argument there. Straw Man Jan 2014 #7

will he be turned over to the feds gejohnston Jan 2014 #3

Criminals...there's just no controlling them it seems. ileus Jan 2014 #5

No controlling the definition of "Big News," either. Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #8

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Guns Seized at Wappapello»Reply #1