It was my understanding (Reply #10) - Democratic Underground

In the discussion thread: State high court to rule: Does 'stand your ground' protect felons who shoot? [View all]

Sat Jul 5, 2014, 07:55 AM

10. It was my understanding

That in order to claim a "stand your ground" defense one could not be breaking the law at the time. According to the report Bragdon was involved in an accurate, which is unlawful. He may still be able to claim self defense even if denied his "stand your ground" claim.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

12 replies	Author	Time	Post
State high court to rule: Does 'stand your ground' protect felons who shoot? [View all]	SecularMotion	Jul 2014	OP
That should be interesting	Duckhunter935	Jul 2014	#1
He is offering a subject for discussion	intaglio	Jul 2014	#2
as he will not and does not discuss	Duckhunter935	Jul 2014	#3
And you are not currently discussing the OP	intaglio	Jul 2014	#4
I did in my initial post	Duckhunter935	Jul 2014	#6
excepth what you say did not happen	Duckhunter935	Jul 2014	#8
It was my understanding	blueridge3210	Jul 2014	#10
FIRST throw him in jail for all appropriate violations	The Green Manalishi	Jul 2014	#12
If it is ruled that the law allows a felon	Jenoch	Jul 2014	#5
So others, currently criminal, can declare open season on the man	intaglio	Jul 2014	#7
Criminals are always going to break the law.	Jenoch	Jul 2014	#9
no it doesn't	gejohnston	Jul 2014	#11

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.