Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: What does this portend for future discussions of gun registries? [View all]on point
(2,506 posts)5. Go Back and re-read. Sudafed is a consumable. Guns are not. Comparison is specious.
Sudafed is consumed and disappears quickly.
Guns are permanent fixtures, long lasting and registration lasts the life of the object.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What does this portend for future discussions of gun registries? [View all]
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
OP
Specious. The argument link is nonsense. Sudafed is a consumable, while guns are not
on point
Nov 2014
#2
Go Back and re-read. Sudafed is a consumable. Guns are not. Comparison is specious.
on point
Nov 2014
#5
"I have a .22 pistol. When I bought it it was registered to me." Question for you
oneshooter
Nov 2014
#38
Wait. People with criminal intent circumvent laws? Shut the front door! nt
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
#33
microstamping would work until a criminal found a file and 3 minutes of spare time.
Travis_0004
Nov 2014
#8
It's not an issue of data volume. It's the fact career criminals have this habit of
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
#13
Violence is perpetrated by people with violent intent. Guns are merely a sub-set.
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
#21
Except Washington DC and Chicago had to be dragged kicking and screaming
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
#30