Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Ammunition is not covered by the 2A [View all]Straw Man
(6,622 posts)21. Ignorant and proud.
That gun knowledge line is several years old. We don't need gun knowledge to want laws passed. It is our right comes from the amendment before the one you burn incense to.
It is your right to advocate for whatever legislation you want. However, legislation that comes from a place of ignorance is going to be bad legislation: weak, rife with contradictions, and potentially unconstitutional.
Several years old? I didn't know that knowledge had an expiration date.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I tend to think this is why Skinner, et al, banished Gun issues to the Gungeon.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2014
#26
By your logic, the democratic party should already be trounced by the hughes amendment.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2014
#47
i594 is horrible. It is going to be openly violated on the steps of the Statehouse.
kioa
Dec 2014
#59
SF? They don't allow sales of Hollow Points but they do allow butt-naked dining outdoors.
NYC_SKP
Dec 2014
#20
The next time somebody gets killed by a dining naked butt you let me know, 'kay?
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2014
#24
Yes, you are entitled to your opinion, just as we are entitled to ignore your opinion
Lurks Often
Dec 2014
#8
My right wing relatives say almost the same exact thing when I try and educate
kelly1mm
Dec 2014
#58
Ah, How I love when people violate the SOP of the General Discussion Forum. But what a GENIUS!
NYC_SKP
Dec 2014
#6
Well, when you're so warm from the explosion, it makes sense to take off your jacket.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2014
#33
One relevant Supreme Court ruling, in addition to D.C. v. Heller and McDonald v Chicago...
benEzra
Dec 2014
#18
Yes, this was well-trodden legal ground, regardless of the topic here being guns.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2014
#34
What cracks me up is that the poster is exercising first amendment rights on a computer.
badtoworse
Dec 2014
#60
Well, that poster is entitled to express their opinion on the internet --
Nuclear Unicorn
Dec 2014
#61