Gun Control & RKBA

kioa

(295 posts)

44. The NFA registry was used to ban every gun not made & registered by 1986.

Tue Dec 2, 2014, 03:39 PM

Dec 2014

California used registration to try & confiscate SKS rifles.

30720. (a) Any person, firm, company, or corporation that is in
possession of an SKS rifle shall do one of the following on or before
January 1, 2000:
(1) Relinquish the SKS rifle to the Department of Justice pursuant
to subdivision (h) of former Section 12281.
(2) Relinquish the SKS rifle to a law enforcement agency pursuant
to former Section 12288, as added by Section 3 of Chapter 19 of the
Statutes of 1989.
(3) Dispose of the SKS rifle as permitted by former Section 12285,
as it read in Section 20 of Chapter 23 of the Statutes of 1994.
(b) Any person who has obtained title to an SKS rifle by bequest
or intestate succession shall be required to comply with paragraph
(1) or (2) of subdivision (a) unless that person otherwise complies
with paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of former Section 12285, as it
read in Section 20 of Chapter 23 of the Statutes of 1994, or as
subsequently amended.
(c) Any SKS rifle relinquished to the department pursuant to this
section shall be in a manner prescribed by the department.

New York City has been using the NYSafe act to confiscate rifles.
Australia & Britian (2 nations routinely held up by gun controllers as examples to emulate) used registration to confiscate guns.

Registration leads to bans & confiscation. It is a deal-breaker & for good reason.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ammunition is not covered by the 2A [View all] hack89 Dec 2014 OP

Why should they? n/t oneshooter Dec 2014 #1

Color me befuddled - What the heck are you talking about? nt Xipe Totec Dec 2014 #2

In a reply to a post in GD: NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #9

I tend to think this is why Skinner, et al, banished Gun issues to the Gungeon. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #26

Indeed, same with religion and all matters Israel/Palestine. NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #29

Happy Tuesday to you as well. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #32

All guns under the NFA that weren't manufactured & registered by 1986 are banned. kioa Dec 2014 #35

The registry can be re-opened. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #36

And it could be re-closed. Or used to confiscate, as it has so often. kioa Dec 2014 #41

The NFA registry was not used to confiscate. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #43

The NFA registry was used to ban every gun not made & registered by 1986. kioa Dec 2014 #44

Other countries are uninteresting to this question. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #45

In the interest of not splitting hairs... kioa Dec 2014 #46

By your logic, the democratic party should already be trounced by the hughes amendment. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #47

There's a very big difference between a nearly 80 kioa Dec 2014 #48

The Hughes Amendment isn't 80 years old. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #49

Gun Control was the only issue that led to recalls prior to 2014. kioa Dec 2014 #50

Nationally, 2014 was neutral about gun control. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #53

I594 had a 7-to-1 spending advantage & only passed 60-40 kioa Dec 2014 #55

Yet, 60% approved that horrible implementation of background checks. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #56

i594 is horrible. It is going to be openly violated on the steps of the Statehouse. kioa Dec 2014 #59

It's not difficult to make ammo. ... spin Dec 2014 #51

you mean like this? Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #3

Did you read the part where it said the bullets were protected by the 2A? hack89 Dec 2014 #10

SF? They don't allow sales of Hollow Points but they do allow butt-naked dining outdoors. NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #20

The next time somebody gets killed by a dining naked butt you let me know, 'kay? Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #24

Banning hollow point rounds is a danger to bystanders. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #27

My earliest lesson in gun safety was related to this topic, tangentially. NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #39

What's surprising is... discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2014 #37

Hey why don't you understand railroad law? upaloopa Dec 2014 #4

Opinions. Straw Man Dec 2014 #5

You gunners need new material. upaloopa Dec 2014 #11

Ignorant and proud. Straw Man Dec 2014 #21

You don't know what I know so you too are ignorant. upaloopa Dec 2014 #38

"Waste of time" but here you are back again and again, like yesterday's cabbage DonP Dec 2014 #40

I don't opine on things about which I know nothing. Straw Man Dec 2014 #42

Do you want laws or do you want effective laws? Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2014 #25

Your ignorance suits me fine hack89 Dec 2014 #7

Yes, you are entitled to your opinion, just as we are entitled to ignore your opinion Lurks Often Dec 2014 #8

U.S. Code: Title 45-RAILROADS sarisataka Dec 2014 #17

What do you mean, "none of us are lawyers?" branford Dec 2014 #22

My right wing relatives say almost the same exact thing when I try and educate kelly1mm Dec 2014 #58

Ah, How I love when people violate the SOP of the General Discussion Forum. But what a GENIUS! NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #6

neither are tanks and nuclear bombs but both are somewhat restricted nt msongs Dec 2014 #12

Actually ammunition is covered by the 2A hack89 Dec 2014 #13

You can buy a tank on the open market. All it takes is $. n/t oneshooter Dec 2014 #23

Paul Allan sarisataka Dec 2014 #31

"Where there's a will, there's a weapon." discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2014 #57

Herrington v. United States (2010) seems to provide some guidance here: petronius Dec 2014 #14

Thank you. Nt hack89 Dec 2014 #15

Aw, you RUINED IT. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #28

All they know is bullets explode, and explosives kill people just like guns. ileus Dec 2014 #16

Oh you naughty, naughty boy. pablo_marmol Dec 2014 #19

They don't just explode, they highly explode! NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #30

Well, when you're so warm from the explosion, it makes sense to take off your jacket. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #33

One relevant Supreme Court ruling, in addition to D.C. v. Heller and McDonald v Chicago... benEzra Dec 2014 #18

Yes, this was well-trodden legal ground, regardless of the topic here being guns. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #34

Gun control "Scholars" tend to be a little short sighted DonP Dec 2014 #52

"It never ceases to amaze me"... NaturalHigh Dec 2014 #54

What cracks me up is that the poster is exercising first amendment rights on a computer. badtoworse Dec 2014 #60

Well, that poster is entitled to express their opinion on the internet -- Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2014 #61

Anyway you look at it, it's a bullshit argument. badtoworse Dec 2014 #62

I am confused as to which poster you are referring to hack89 Dec 2014 #63

The poster commenting on the 2A and ammo. badtoworse Dec 2014 #64