Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)

6. They reference Hemenway & Kellerman because little pro-control "research" has sprouted since then...

Reply to pablo_marmol (Reply #5)

Tue Apr 14, 2015, 02:19 PM

Apr 2015

If the field was vital and on sure ground, those and other studies would have been replicated at least beyond the age of VRTs. Maybe they fear another Bellisiles breach burst.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

6 Things Gun Lovers and Haters Can Agree On [View all] derby378 Apr 2015 OP

A bit of a blast to read discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #1

Don't show nr 2 to Hoyt- he will have a sadz. Not hack89 Apr 2015 #2

Double dog dare you to post that in Bansalot. Nt hack89 Apr 2015 #3

I'm the first Rec. nt Electric Monk Apr 2015 #4

Perfectly honest on most points, extremely dishonest on one. pablo_marmol Apr 2015 #5

They reference Hemenway & Kellerman because little pro-control "research" has sprouted since then... Eleanors38 Apr 2015 #6

Maybe more pro-control research HAS been done, but they didn't like the results Lurks Often Apr 2015 #7

May be. It's curious they don't even fost a drug-war-like "latest study." Maybe academia is Eleanors38 Apr 2015 #8

Give this man a cigar! pablo_marmol Apr 2015 #9

The gun control lobby rode #5 and #3 off a cliff benEzra Apr 2015 #10