Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
9. I just wonder who he used to be?
Thu May 14, 2015, 06:12 PM
May 2015

The proposals and misrepresentations he makes are common, overused and only supported by "Hemenway quality research", in other words, a sack 'o crap.

But I'm sure this dedicated crusader for gun safety, unlike the hundreds that came before him, will change minds and offset the 90 million plus US gun owners out there, and SCOTUS with his simple logic and passion.

K&R..... daleanime May 2015 #1
Finding an OP title... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2015 #2
By what portion would UBC reduce that number? clffrdjk May 2015 #3
It's just another on the hit parade list discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2015 #4
Oh yea I fully expect the "it's a good first step" reply clffrdjk May 2015 #5
I just wonder who he used to be? DonP May 2015 #9
Lol he does seem a bit familiar but I haven't been around enough lately to give a good guess. clffrdjk May 2015 #11
I applaud the newbie's enthusiasm, but ManiacJoe May 2015 #6
Did you know that the magazine Mother Jones takes its name from a women that was the Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #7
Anyone who uses Mother Jones as an objective source on this issue has questionable intelligence Shamash May 2015 #8
NOT TO WORRY Nasty Jack May 2015 #40
An argument from authority, by a "legal professional" that gets the law wrong? friendly_iconoclast May 2015 #53
Here, let me fix that for you. beevul May 2015 #10
Here to stay. Nasty Jack May 2015 #12
Now that there is funny stuff! DonP May 2015 #16
Fine. Get back to me on the 12th... beevul May 2015 #17
Golly. We've never encountered and ardent gun control advocate before. Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #18
I guess that makes you #3 discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2015 #19
ROFL... beevul May 2015 #20
When will that be exactly? clffrdjk May 2015 #21
My replies. Nasty Jack May 2015 #24
If everyone you are talking to doesn't make sense to you maybe you are the problem. clffrdjk May 2015 #27
The comments Nasty Jack May 2015 #29
My point stands clffrdjk May 2015 #35
Several have shown that your contention about no restrictions is demonstrably false. Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #33
LOL OK.... virginia mountainman May 2015 #25
Comedy gold. cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #30
... and stay and stay and stay ... Straw Man May 2015 #31
ONLY GUN NUTS THINK THEY ARE IMMORTAL Nasty Jack May 2015 #41
"absolutely no restrictions on who they are sold to" blueridge3210 May 2015 #42
WHAT? I CAN'T HEAR YOU! Straw Man May 2015 #56
Funny, controllers said I wouldn't last long on DU. That was 9 years ago. Eleanors38 May 2015 #39
Interestingly... Puha Ekapi May 2015 #57
"absolutely no restrictions on who they are sold to." blueridge3210 May 2015 #13
Origional headline not enough. Had to add an insult to it. oneshooter May 2015 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author oneshooter May 2015 #15
Interesting choice of words sarisataka May 2015 #22
What other rights cost too much for us to have??? ileus May 2015 #23
"absolutely no restrictions on who they are sold to" blueridge3210 May 2015 #26
this baffled a lot of Torontonians: they can't GET that reforms that 70% of *NRA* members want MisterP May 2015 #28
The problem is the gun control movement and their "its a good start" attitude hack89 May 2015 #34
Exactly. Straw Man May 2015 #36
DREAMER Nasty Jack May 2015 #43
"Change is coming" - gun control's motto for 20 years and counting. Nt hack89 May 2015 #44
No gun show "loophole". blueridge3210 May 2015 #46
Dreamer sounds spot on... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2015 #47
"You people need to learn that changes are coming." ... LOL! What again? DonP May 2015 #48
Really trying to crimp the mirth aren't you? discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2015 #49
His crystal ball needs a *lot* of Windex; this from him, in 2013: friendly_iconoclast May 2015 #54
Channeling your inner... Puha Ekapi May 2015 #58
There is no such thing as a gunshow loophole. Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #62
The problem with the gun-control outlook is its extremism... Eleanors38 May 2015 #38
Well "Nasty Jack"......... pablo_marmol May 2015 #32
Nasty Jack, you've got a bit of cognitive dissonance going on: friendly_iconoclast May 2015 #37
WHAT THE HELL IS THIS ALL SUPPOSED TO MEAN? Nasty Jack May 2015 #45
And you tend to yell way too much. n/t oneshooter May 2015 #50
It's necessary to get through to gun nuts. Nasty Jack May 2015 #51
You might try using the truth sometime. blueridge3210 May 2015 #52
And again with the insult oneshooter May 2015 #55
who do you... Puha Ekapi May 2015 #64
I have no idea... Puha Ekapi May 2015 #59
It means.. virginia mountainman May 2015 #61
LOL... Very good post Friendly! virginia mountainman May 2015 #60
but....butt guns kill people donja' know!!! ileus May 2015 #63
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»U.S. PAYS DEARLY FOR GUN ...»Reply #9