Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: U.S. PAYS DEARLY FOR GUN NUTS' RIGHTS TO THEIR TOYS [View all]pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)32. Well "Nasty Jack".........
.......what folks like you fail to acknowledge is that defensive gun use is a reality. Even a survey by gun-restriction "scholars" Philip Cook and Jens Ludwig came up with high numbers of defensive uses. As high, in fact, as offensive uses.
Which means whatever cost the taxpayers are forced to pay in criminal gun uses (offensive) is saved by what is NOT SPENT by these defensive uses.
Derp.....derp......derp.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Lol he does seem a bit familiar but I haven't been around enough lately to give a good guess.
clffrdjk
May 2015
#11
Did you know that the magazine Mother Jones takes its name from a women that was the
Nuclear Unicorn
May 2015
#7
Anyone who uses Mother Jones as an objective source on this issue has questionable intelligence
Shamash
May 2015
#8
An argument from authority, by a "legal professional" that gets the law wrong?
friendly_iconoclast
May 2015
#53
If everyone you are talking to doesn't make sense to you maybe you are the problem.
clffrdjk
May 2015
#27
Several have shown that your contention about no restrictions is demonstrably false.
Nuclear Unicorn
May 2015
#33