Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

benEzra

(12,148 posts)

4. Just like Vermont. Shock, horror.

Reply to beevul (Original post)

Tue Jun 2, 2015, 02:20 PM

Jun 2015

And the idea that one might use a centerfire .22 to shoot bear or moose is ludicrous. The view over at Field and Stream seems to be that even a .270 (twice the muzzle energy of a .223) is marginal for moose or elk, and that the better minimum choice is probably .30-06 Springfield.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Maine a step closer to no-permit concealed handguns [View all] beevul Jun 2015 OP

Cool thanks for the info Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #1

I suppose you can shoot a bear sarisataka Jun 2015 #2

You keep posting cartoons and the "Intellectual Elites" from Bansalot may sue you DonP Jun 2015 #3

looking for a common language sarisataka Jun 2015 #7

Just like Vermont. Shock, horror. benEzra Jun 2015 #4

Remember that the AR-15 upper receiver has been expanded to quite a few larger calibers Shamash Jun 2015 #5

Every citizen has a right to keep and bear arms and this right shall never be questioned Shamash Jun 2015 #6

Looks like another defeat for gun owners......oh wait, it's another victory isn't it? Lurks Often Jun 2015 #8

Nice to see a little good news on the 2A front. ileus Jun 2015 #9

Georgia Laws creeker Jun 2015 #10

wut WUT?! pablo_marmol Jun 2015 #11